However, I think some of the reaction to it seems either hastily pre-judged or betraying muddled thinking.
For instance, Keith Vaz said "I regard this remark as racist, because it is deeply offensive", which is a non sequitur. For something to be 'racist' it has to arise out of prejudice, which you could argue may well have been true in this case, but it does not follow merely from Mr Vaz, or black people or anyone else being offended by it.
When I discussed this word with a black friend, he said "I don't like the word 'n-'" (which he said in full). Does this mean that if a black person overheard and was offended, that my friend was being racist?
Also another black friend of mine says he is not offended by racist remarks because, as he says "If I allow myself to be offended, then they've won".
You must distinguish between criticism of inappropriate language and accusations of racism
Tags: