What does an uncontrolled demolition of a building look like?

Question

This is geared to everyone who thinks that the WTC collapses were a controlled demolition. For all you demolition "experts" out there, how do you know that an uncontrolled demolition of a skyscraper doesn't look the same as a controlled demolition?

Answer 1

An uncontrolled demolition would have blown out the bottom floors. As a result of this the building would have toppled like a tree over a few city blocks and on top of other surrounding buildings.

So the WTC was a 'controlled' demolition so that it would fall straight down.

Answer 2

I think it is all explained in here

http://www.911blogger.com/node/10025

Answer 3

Section 8 housing/the Projects.

Answer 4

Uh oh, here come all the junior engineers who think they know what they're talking about because they played with Lincoln Logs when they were a kid.

Answer 5

a pile of rubble

Answer 6

With a controlled demolition the charges are placed in the bottom of the building. The building them collapses on itself. ie the top is the last part of the building to come down. Both Twin Towers collapsed from the top first, something you will never see in a controlled explosion. How did the conspirators know for sure that both planes would in fact be successfull in hitting their target .Would they have blown it up anyway ? Or leave tons of explosives there for anyone to find ? Hardly likely.