Here's the problem. Anarchy is defined in several different ways, and when discussing Anarchy, we come across this problem:
Is anarchy a place with no rules whatsoever, or is it where the people make the rules?
I'm constantly having friends bring up Anarchy in debates, but I have a problem with it. They say it's fair and even chances for everyone. This isn't true from what I'm getting from it. Those who have more physical power will be able to control and manipulate the weaker. What will end up happening is that the weaker will say they are on the side of the stronger, as to avoid becoming prey to the stronger. Then, when I explain this, people tell me that that isn't Anarchy. Then I argue, Anarchy is impossible.
What is Anarchy in your definition? How would it work instead of a government? Please use details and be specific.
Tags: