What happened on 911?

Question

I have not yet decided what I believe, but thus far noone has been able to produce a valid argument against the conspiracy theory. Could someone try? If I didn't want an answer I wouldn't ask.

Answer 1

I think that the gov't of the US blew up their own buildings. 9/11 was a total inside job!

Answer 2

The valid arguments are the facts of the case, thousands died and people are mocking that with there I hate Bush rhetoric.

Answer 3

Conspiracy theorists are just retards attempting to cause chaos.

Don't let them manipulate you, they're like lawyers with their convincing arguments full of bull c**p..

Answer 4

Good on ya for asking. Shows U are not a sheeple

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheeple

On Sept. 11 2001 some elite global freaks used crooks in our govt and military to blow up the world trade center. They did it for money & war and to get us ready for one-world fascist government. Too many details to list. Try snooping around this site for info.

http://www.wanttoknow.info/911informatio...

Answer 5

there is no valid argument that 9/11 was not planned.

people who believe it was all to do with Arab 'terrorists' are only believing the WORDS of people they naively think they can trust.

the gov't's version of 9/11 by NIST actually says at the very bottom, that their whole argument is a hypothesis!!!

scroll down to the very end:

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs...

secondly, most people believe what they see & hear on TV news.

but the news is horribly biased. scroll down & compare these graphs:

http://ifamericansknew.org/media/net-rep...

the US Media is owned, or controlled by, the very same people who had an interest in the consequences of 9/11:

http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/jewsc...

http://www.natvan.com/who-rules-america/

the American news is packed with lies - all told by pretty TV presenters with big smiles.

if you haven't decided for yourself, then i think it's important for you to consider what happened BEFORE 9/11:

the WTC history is interesting - did you know it wasn't actually 'wanted' anymore??

the WTC was no longer profitable at all.

its construction had already begun before the use of asbestos was banned in 1971, so spray-on asbestos fire retardant was used up to the 40th floors (64th floor in the North Tower) & a different insulating material was used for the remaining floors.

the owners (the Port Authority) were required to remove all the asbestos but the just scaffolding alone would cost more than $1 million.

so then permission to have the towers demolished was refused due to the deadly toxic asbestos dust that would cover NY.

http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integri...

http://www.mesotheliomasos.com/newsWTCco...

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2008/05/...

the cost of the alternative, to dismantle it floor by floor, was simply ridiculous.

despite all this, Larry Silverstein decided to lease the WTC six months before 9/11 & insured the buildings against 'terrorist' attacks. he put a down-payment of $124 million for the 99 year lease (although he persuased investors to put up most of the cash!), then claimed for two separate attacks (2 planes) & was rewarded $4,6 BILLION.

secondly, the fact that Silverstein admitted on national television that he gave permission to demolish WTC7 is enough evidence for me that 9/11 was planned. to demolish a 47 floor building neatly like that needs enormous preparation & therefore he must have known about it before 9/11:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV1...

* note: he said "pull it" not "pull them" (as in the firemen)

this short video explains very well how the demolition workers got into the WTC:

http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?mkt=nl-n...

& this is a general summary:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxqsJHihd...

& i could go on & on! there's so much that points to an inside job that i don't understand why Americans refuse to believe the truth so adamantly. the main problem is of course, the Americans are emotionally charged by 9/11, whereas the rest of the world can see it more objectively & see it for what it was - an excuse to invade Iraq.

Answer 6

Bin Laden did it.  Bush is stupid and a lot of other things but he is not evil.  

Answer 7

It's sad there is no real evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.  That's why the FBI still doesn't want him for 9/11 but he's still #1 AMW.

So you don't get thrown off by some of the wacky stuff out there look at these news articles and time lines:

http://truth911.co.cc

http://www.historycommons.org

Answer 8

planes did crash into the twin towers and thousands died.  Those are just about the only facts I know.  Everything else is questionable and speculation. Who were the hijackers? How were they so successful in hijacking planes and hitting targets when so many things could have gone wrong for them?  Why did the towers come down so quickly? What does the physical evidence at the pentagone crash site really say? What does the physical evidence at the Pennsylvania crash site really say?  There are lots of questions and we are asked to have blind faith in the official answers.  As we get further and further away from 9/11/2001 I think people care less and less about the answers.  I think when the Bush administration is out of office there will be more information revealed.

Answer 9

2 planes hit 2 buildings!

Answer 10

watch the movie Loose Change

it describes 9/11 in COMPLETE DETAILS.

Answer 11

more thann 3 thousands american lost thier lives is all you need to know and that Bush, MCCAIN ,CHENEY  was all behind it.

Answer 12

You are obviously not a New Yorker. Seeing something like that changes you forever and I find your question upsetting. If you think it was done by anyone who was not a radical America-hater, you are either to young or too naive to judge for yourself.

Answer 13

Go to google, type in "World Trade Center Designer" and go to the article about 6 from the top, titled "The New York World Trade Center-Building on Ground Zero".  This should put a lot of your questions into prospective.  There are many articles from Structural Engineers, Physicists at MIT.  The whole Bit, check out some of the links in the article and you will see what I mean.

Answer 14

Yes, there have been plenty of valid arguments against the conspiracy theories, but you're predisposed to not believe the "arguments", so it's no good to try and convince you otherwise.

Asking for proof against a conspiracy theory that is based off made up facts and shaky evidence to begin with just cheapens the lives of the 3000 people who died on that day.

STFU.

GTFO.

Read these two sites:

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/...

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseCha...

Answer 15

How could someone else beliefs 'cheapen' the no-longer-existing life of another person? That makes no sense. There is overwhelming evidence that 9/11 didn't happen the way the official story says it did.

Answer 16

umm idk whats conspiracy?

Answer 17

a Valid arguement AGAINST the conspiracy theory?  How about the extensive congressional and 3rd party reports on the matter, or the dozens (hundreds?) of books that have been written it?  Your answer is only a library away my friend.

Answer 18

a bunch of pissed off muslims and terrorist b******s decided to stick a d***o in america's ***

Answer 19

Islamic terrorists partially fulfilled a long term goal of theirs.  They had intended to destroy more and bring America (in particular) and western culture (in general) to its knees.  All this was done in order to bring about the world-wide dominance of their understanding of the Islamic religion.

They had been at war with us for many years before that most dramatic attack, but we (Americans, both Democratic and Republican administrations) had mostly been ignoring them due to their relative lack of prior success, and our general belief that they did not have the resources to pull off such a large attack.

There has been no abatement of the desire to attack us, though arguably they are less able to pull off large scale attacks here, currently.  

Answer 20

Bin Laden and his group of "followers" or whatever you want to call them planned a attack on the U.S. and carried it out the best the could.  Plain and simple.

Answer 21

how about that it worked?

I mean when has Bush done anything which has gone to plan?

Iraq? Afghanistan? Economy? Are all disasters thanks to President Bush. The fact that 9/11 worked should be reason enough to conclude that Bush was not behind it.  

Answer 22

Osama Bin Laden actually took the credit for it - if he didn't do it then why did he make himself the most wanted man on the planet.

There would have had to be loads of people in on it to pull it off if it were an inside job - don't you think someone would have blown the whistle by now?  They couldn't even keep the monica lewinski affair a secret - do u really think they could keep this a secret.

what's the motive - don't say oil - if they want oil that much they would just take it - plus they've probably spent more money on this war than the oil is worth.

the conspiracy theorists always come up with answers that contradict themselves

Answer 23

go on youtube and watch "loose change"

then watch "conspiracy theories debunked"

then choose which ones to believe