What if Depsey was 6'6 and willard was 6'1?

Question

would the result be more devestating then it was , or would willard have won ?

Answer 1

Willard could have been EIGHT feet tall. . .the legendary Dempsey would have whipped him anyway.   And if Dempsey had been six six. . . .he could (possibly) have been the best heavy of all time.

Answer 2

depsvey would have destroyed him almost immediately

Answer 3

What if Germany had the B-2 bomber!

Answer 4

Willard had about as much chance as a mounted knight did against a tank.  Willard was a primitive fighter compared to Dempsey.

If Demspey were 6'6", he'd have lost most of the agility that made him so effective.  Boxers that big just aren't that fast, and a guy like Dempsey at 6'1" could really exploit it.  It's also the same reason why he would beat any of today's big heavy.

Answer 5

Dempsey was chiseled and in shape.  He also had great punching power and speed.  The height would have made no difference here.

Answer 6

haha dude depsey would have killed him.