What if Federer had played the first two sets the way he play the third and fourth?

Question

I started watching from the third set and think Federer would have won if he was that good in the first two? I give it to Nadal though. He is the best now.

Answer 1

He would probably had won it at 7-6 7-6 7-6 against Nadal.

Answer 2

I agree with Incognito, however it is impossible to tell, because Nadal almost won the second tiebreaker they played, perhaps he was nervous at the prospect of winning in the 4th set. Lots of factors affected Federer's play in Wimbeldon this year, but I'm sure he'll bounce back, he just needs to ignore the stupid media that are trying to make a big deal out of his loss.

Answer 3

it's hard to predict... it is not impossible for nadal also to win after 2 set deficit... in my opinion, it will still be a long and tight match between the two of them

Answer 4

i think it was Nadal getting tight in the 3rd and 4th set, although federer could have played better

Answer 5

Yeah he had a lead in the 2nd set but blew it. Poor Roger. If he had won that set and the next 2 tiebreakers..that'd really be something.

Answer 6

he would have fun it

Answer 7

Yes he would have kicked raffas ***!! iM SOOO GUTTED HE LOST!!