Would you accept this as the truth as long as he had 5,000 other people saying this was true? Or would you ask him to present his data to how he came to this conclusion?
If someone said they could predict the future, and they know what the future would be like in 30 years, wouldn't you want to test them by asking them what the future would be in 6 months, 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years, and see the data on how they came to their conclusion?
And shouldn't we be suspicious of their claims if they tell us that they can't provide this information, we should just trust them, but they need our money, and need it now because we have less than 18 months to act least we be turned into cannibals?
How does "Global Warming" differ from Eugenics? Many smart people still believe and there's ongoing research in Eugenics even though over 6 million people died for the cause.
Dare we make the same mistake twice? Or should we demand the proof first?
Tags: