What if the baby a Republican is saving, from abortion, turns out to be g*y?

Question

You see the predicament the Republican would be in.

Answer 1

I don't see a problem here.  It is an "oh well" issue.  Besides, evolution will not select the child to reproduce and carry on the mutation.  

Answer 2

it would be like any other baby saved

they'd  say s***w it, let it fend for itself

Answer 3

If the child chooses to be g*y at least it has a choice.  Isn't "choice" what the pro-abortion folks are always screaming about?

Answer 4

Maybe it would be someone that saves the world too.

Why do libs think Repubs hate them, cause that's a falsehood.

Answer 5

Every baby should have a chance at life.

I do not believe babies are born g*y.

The baby might grow up and discover the cure for cancer or it might grow up to be a bank robber.  We won't know if it is killed in the womb.

Answer 6

How can you tell if the baby is g*y from being in the womb???!!!

Gosh!

Answer 7

The baby's ultimate decision on his or her choice of sexual preference does not have any bearing on whether the child should live or die.  

Would someone knowingly abort the future President of the United States?  Of course not.  But every abortion IS killing a potential future President of the United States.   We don't make life and death decisions on someone's potential.  We shouldn't be making that decision at all.

Answer 8

then you drown the f*g child

Answer 9

No.

There would be another g*y living human.

I don't like libs defining me.

Answer 10

No, that is NOT how I see it.  g*y?  So what?  I'm a Republican and I have g*y friends.  Two, in particular, have been good friends for over 20 years.  I respect them, they respect me.  That's how it works.

Answer 11

The baby should live to make that decision. I am a Republican and could care less if the baby turns out to be g*y or worse liberal.

Answer 12

No theree is not predicament of any kind , because in trying to help babies to be born , then no one know of a way to tell what they are going to turn out to be as an adult . The belief the Republicans are trying to uphold is that every thing living in the womb or on earth  has a right to be born . You seem pretty smug about your question , does this mean you would let a person born and raised and then becomes a homosexual , you think it should never have been born . Man you are sick if that is your idea.

Answer 13

OMG this is the first time I've laughed out loud all day!

This is a heckuva predicament isn't it?  

I would love to see the statistics on the number of Reps vs Dems who adopt, the number of "Christians" vs "non-believers" who adopt.

And I'll bet a dollar if they asked the question and it was answered honestly, you'd find the overwhelming majority of women seeking abortions call themselves "Christians" - as the majority of Americans claim to be.

If McCain is elected (insert gagging sound) I propose that everyone who voted for him sign a pledge that they will be happy to take on and raise any children that would have otherwise been aborted.  Think of all the new Republicans that can be indoctrinated this way. Sounds to me like a win-win.

Answer 14

HAHAHA what a full circle slap in the face.

Answer 15

Its still a life saved to me. g*y people dont bother me.  

Answer 16

Then so be it.  The child still deserves life -- ya think?

Answer 17

Republicans don't care about saving babies one way or another.  What they care about is making sure women have no reproductive freedom.  Republicans are people without souls, so they only thing they can do is insinuate themselves into somebody else's life.  Too bad so many Americans are fooled by this useless arrogance.