What is Palin's stance on the Iraq war?

Question

Again...bet you can't. By her own admission "I haven't really focused much on the war in Iraq"

Answer 1

" I don't know much about the Iraq War"

Answer 2

She is learning it right now.

She is a republican puppet who only met mccain once

Answer 3

you have as much info as i have heard--she hasn't really thought about it much...great qualifications, eh?

Answer 4

Palin does not need to "focus on the Iraq war" to define her stance. She gave her stance in her two stated beliefs: Creationism and that invading Iraq prevented another 911. Through those statements she has defined her foreign policy. This applies to the Iraq War, the future war with Iran (the "Barbara Anne" war), as well as the future Georgia-war against Russia, then Syria and Lebanon to extract Hezbola, Pakistan, and Turkey to protect the Curds and Whey, and finally, the Falklands. Palin noted that "we haven't been attacked since we" (invaded) Iraq." Thus if not for the Iraq war, America would have been attacked, which requires her to believe that by sabre-rattling, and invading countries America gets safer. Palin lacks JFK's learned-fear (from "experience") that too much saber-rattling risks painting Americans into corners. Her entire foreign policy is easily derived from her statements. If, as she says, invading a country (Iraq) makes America less likely to be attacked, then:Why is it that if America invades other countries, it "makes Americans safer", but when other countries perpetrate invasions, it makes them unsafe? Does the same behavior makes THEM less safe? The only explanation is that Americans must be different (superior). The Palin doctrine is America uses force to teach other nations right from wrong, like a spanking. When Iran does anything, it's a "behavior". When we do it it's "protecting America's interests." Thus other countries we invade must think: "Oh, you Americans taught us right from wrong, because of their freedom, so we'll renounce the axis-evil and Rev Wright,l because America's scared us Iranians like Step'in Fetchit was scared he called Hillary at 3 A.M. on that comedy skit." "We Iranians are not mad because our hospitals blowed up: it was we Iranians that blew em by our behaviors. So Iranians will be Christians and never use birth control again. Palin's Creationism means Palin ACTUALLY BELIEVES THAT  women physically came from Adam's Rib, so we can force Iranians to eat pork, but since ribs are really women, we'll have those little Berka-Hoods on the spare-ribs." That's how Palin sas the Iraq war prevented a 2nd attack on the WTC. Being attacked never teaches Americans a "lesson", since Americans are teachers. Contrast: JFK learned different from the Cuban Missle Crisis.Americans (falsely) believed JFK stood his ground and threatened nuclear war, since he "Knew" that would solve the problem. "Of course" Commies would back down and remove Cuban missles since, Americans would  never "negotiate" and "reward" the commies with concessions. They would have to remove Cuban missiles before we would promise not to invade Cuba. Extinction of all life is worth it to prevent one side from doing something first that they would do anyway. This is the logical conclusion of Palin's stated "cause-and-effect" statements.Americans would be perfectly safe dropping a few nukes on Russia, since unlike Americans, Russians back down. People believed that's why the Russians backed down in '62, as Palin's observation of the safety effect of American military force. History teachers taught that nonsense in '68. Russians are Godless hedonists who don't believe in Palin's after-life. Palin wouldn't have rewarded Russia by "negotiating" with them, based on the belief that a threat to nuke Russia "into the stone age" will cow them. They only care about their own skin. But  Americans are with God, which is a higher value than human life, (except American lives, where it's a tie). Americans are therefore prepared to bomb Russia or Iran  (Palin the Basketball coach). That's what it takes to "win". Only then will God be happy. Palin's "Creationism" supports the belief that the afterlife can be a fallback since if we lose, our side will go to heaven, (just like our soulmates, the suicide bombers). This give the war option less downside risks than commies, who only care about themselves. But Eli Abel in 1968 in his book and declassified docs say the opposite: Kennedy and Nikita were exactly the same. They realized how their mutual stupidly got them into this mess. They knew that God had left them on their own. They knew Americans had needlessly spooked Russia by its rhetoric, by invading Cuba, and by its nukes 5 minutes away in Turkey, and the Russians stupidly did other nasties, like Cuban missiles. JFK and NK understood what Palin can’t, which is Creationism doesn’t give us an "out", and any hostile act would endangers everyone. So JFK and NK agreed to keep secret the concessions (not to invade Cuba and remove Turkey Missiles) so Palin wouldn't get mad at them. Palin, of course, knows her place as a rib-woman and would leave such decisions to the generals, which would have left us all dead at JFK done the same. But JFK is a man and this is a man's area.

Answer 5

Im sure its the same as Bush's

Answer 6

Legs spread gun aimed...Moosehead  between her teeth???

Has anybody seen TINA FEY lately?  

http://mashable.com/wp-content/uploads/2...

Answer 7

What does that have to do with her duties of getting coffee and wearing low cut sweaters?

Answer 8

Neither has the Democrat majority in Congress. Remember those that were going to end the war?  Seems they haven't really paid much attention the war lately, either.

Answer 9

im sure Karl Rove will tell her what to think and say

Answer 10

Well, he son is serving in the Army so I would trust her to do the right thing and not just give hollow words like BHO.

And she is CINC of the Alaskan National Guard.

Answer 11

What is Obamas stance? I mean today...I can't keep up.

Answer 12

she doesnt have one!