What is better, micro-UZI or MAC11/MAC10

Question

both are machine pistols, but which one is better? MAC11 is 9mm, MAC10 is .45 ACP, Micro-UZI is 9mm but can be converted to .45 ACP.

Answer 1

pfft Mac 11 by far...

Answer 2

I think the micro-uzi is too small.  The Mac 10 is a little bit bigger which makes it more controllable.

you seem to think a small full auto gun is good, it is not.

Answer 3

UZI's are way better!

Answer 4

The UZU is a better built gun.... Thats not saying much. In semi-auto they are both inaccurate..... There only good for full auto bursts and thats about it.... If you want a 9MM or a .45 get a regular handgun......

Answer 5

MACs over heat, and jam, but UZi have accuracy issues, and are just plain expensive rip offs of the MAC

If you have the money and don't mind a recommendation- try the MP5 K, its slightly bigger, but more accurate, easier to handle, and not as tough on itself.

If you can wait a few years, the KRIS is suppose to be way better then them all, but they have issues too.

Answer 6

I don't particularly care for the small "fists of fury" sub-machine guns. But if I was to use one in a hostenvironmentment, I would lean towards  the MAC10 45 ACP, suppressed.

Answer 7

The Micro UZI wins by way of superior quality.

All of these guns are of very limited usefulness, being best suited to bodyguard duty by agencies such as the Secret Service.

If you're interested in the semi-auto pistol versions, the UZI is about three times the price of the MAC's. That combined with the fact that MAC parts are easy to find, whereas IMI Mini-UZI parts are scarce, might make me lean towards the MAC instead. Such semi-auto weapons are again, of limited usefulness, but are fun (but expensive) to plink with. I don't recomend any of them for self-defense.

Answer 8

I'm not a big fan of these type of guns but if U had to pick one I would go with the UZI,they are made better than the Macs.