What is the difference between an adult who makes a choice to join the military, and a baby dying without it?

Question

This is mainly for Liberals, and others who agree with a "woman's" "right" to choose death for their unborn babies, but yet, it appears these same Liberals are against an adults right to choose whether or not to fight in the Military, and obey the rules, and oath they swore by. I cannot understand this thinking. A baby doesn't get a choice but to die, at the will of a woman who doesn't want a baby she created, but an adult who knows the risks he/she takes in joining the military to fight, and maybe die, is being used by the government?

Can any pro-choice advocate make sense of this for me, with logical reason?

By the way, if a baby makes it through a botched abortion, Barack Obama thinks giving said child medical-care, is interfering with the original decision of death for the baby:Fox News: Hannity, and Combs, last night.

Thanks for reasonable answers. What say you?

Answer 1

They are not really babies.  All they have is ears, eyes, noses, heart beats, sense of touch, taste, smell, lungs, heart beats, and fully functioning organs, heart beats, and heart beats by the time they 8 weeks in the womb..

Answer 2

If you would like to receive reasonable answers, you would have to ask reasonable questions.  Who says liberals are against an adult choosing to enter into the military?  Many liberals have done just that.  

Abortions are not performed on babies, they are performed on fetuses.  

You cannot understand this thinking because you choose not to deal with facts but with emotional rhetoric.

Answer 3

Isn't a big part of the reason that more and more people are killing each other around the world that there are way too many to begin with?  What I don't understand is why anyone in their right mind would want to force women to bring more humans into this world just so they can shoot each other or die of starvation later on.  Imho, it's making babies not abortion that should be the crime.

Answer 4

They do not want anyone to make decisions; only the "Government"can decide for you. That is If they are the Government.

Answer 5

Agreed, but why do Republicans vote against programs that help disadvantaged kids?

Answer 6

I'm against military NWO pawns being sent to die for empire expansion and the population reduction  of asians  

and also against the gov't's use of population control via abortion clinics.

LOL..yeah. Barak, wringing the baby's neck saying "This baby wasn't supposed to live!"

Answer 7

wow---now that's deep----better be careful about trying to inject a little logic and reason around here.

Answer 8

Good luck overturning Roe V. Wade :)

Answer 9

Pro-choice /anti-women/pro-abortion extremists are not worth asking. Ya know what I mean?

~

Answer 10

You're trying to compare two things that have nothing to do with one another. You're also assuming that the people who disagree with you are looking at it from your perspective, and they are not.  

Answer 11

Pro-life/anti-women extremists, are not worth asking.

They are one French fry short of a happy meal, if you know what I am saying.

Answer 12

There is no such thing as an "unborn baby."