first of all the ranking of nations based on medal count means nothing, some rank nations based on how many medals they got and other rank them on how many gold medal they got.
neither of those methods makes senses, because if turkey for example had two great athletes in a specific sport and got only two gold medal and Italy had 1 gold,9 silver and 8 bronze, then turkey would be considered a better nation ??? Just because they got one more gold medal???
And I am sorry to say for Britain but counting 4 gold medals in one event just because it was a team makes no sense either when comparing nations.
their should be a simple method of doing it, by giving 3 points for gold, 2 for silver and 1 for bronze and giving one medal count per final and not for each athlete in a team.
Tags: