What is trhe government hiding about the Bruce E. Ivins anthrax investigation and his suicide?

Question

What is trhe government hiding about the Bruce E. Ivins anthrax investigation and his suicide?

Answer 1

No mather how you look at it: We will never know. There will be no trial, the FBI will not have to present their spectacular new evidence (that they couldn’t find in the previous 7 years), Ivins lawyer can’t proove before a court of law his innocence. In the public eye however, Ivins will go into history as the perputrader who sent the anthrax letters. Thanks to ms. Jean Duley the world now knows that he was “homocidal” and a “sociopath” (which is an odd combination) and we can close the lid.

From a conspiracy point of few his suicide will be too convenient to be true and will be as riddled with mistery as the “suicide” of dr. David Kelly in the UK.

Answer 2

**I'm not sure but I hope that it comes out at some point, or at least his family get to know, mightn't be something that needs to be made public knowledge though.**

Answer 3

Another victim of state torture, Dr, Ivins was recruited to panic the Federal legislative branch, and the FCC media into fearmongering. This is the setup for the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the islamic extremist connection to attacks against these citizens on home turf. As a highlight, pharmaceutical product languishing for a market (Cipro) developed a huge demand, and saved the share price for those stock market speculators behind the scenes.

Answer 4

Oh for goodness sake. The Bruce Ivins sounded nuttier than a fruitcake and that was all ignored as he was actively helping the FBI. Now, I see where the FBI is trying to claim new "advance" techniques that enabled them to identify Ivins as a suspect when they couldn't years ago.

Now THAT'S the coverup! The FBI could had and should had been investigating Irvins in June,2002 at the latest! They should not had been harassing Stephen Hatfill to the point of wrecking his career and paying $5.8 million.  

The other coverup may be that Bruce Ivins was showing signs of being an angry nut as early as 2000, according to reports, yet he had clearance to working with weaponized anthrax. Should someone had removed Ivins from working with a level 4 biohazard? Hard to say, but there are indications that was the case from what's been reported so far.

But  at least no one else was getting killed after September,2001.  Seems like Ivins would had mailed more letters after 2001 if Fort Detrick employees weren't being immediately investigated.

But I'll leave the consiparcy theorist something I haven't seen brought up yet: why did an experienced microbiologist like Ivins send out leaky packages? Seems they were sent in regular envelopes contaminating post offices. Here's my answer: Ivins was a NUT!!!! NUT NUT NUT!!!! No conspiracy.

Answer 5

Dr Philip Zack is the guy who sent the Anthrax in the mail.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/anthra...

Steven Hatfill and Bruce Ivins are just "fall guys."  Have you ever noticed how the Mainstream Media are going into smear mode about  Bruce Ivins.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080803/ap_o...

Answer 6

Probably nothing, however that will not stop the conspiracy theorists.

Answer 7

Alot of stuff, they always do that. (thinks about roswell event)

Answer 8

They are hiding a lot.  Another big cover-up.