Question:

What is your take on the Bosnian Pyramid?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Ancient culture or ordinary hill?

 Tags:

   Report

5 ANSWERS


  1. It's just a hill, as geologists and archaeologists have verified.

    The existence of neolithic artifacts is not unusual in this continuously inhabited and fertile region of Europe, since the Upper Paleolithic era.


  2. Ordinary hill.  Interesting tschotschkes have resulted from it's "discovery", however!

  3. The sites claimed as pyramids were likely used by late neolithic hunter-gatherer groups.  This can account for the artifacts.  These groups lived in caves and were nomadic, the likelihood of a society building massive monumental stone structures during the last glacial maximum are pretty close to nil.  I won't say it is impossible but it is highly unlikely.  Where was the stone quarried from?  It would have had to have been far to the south because at that time the ground would have been frozen solid between 6 and 12 months of the year.  A 220m structure (proposed height of the sun pyramid) would be higher than the Great Pyramid by almost 1/3.  The Egyptians used conscript/slave labor to erect the Pyramids, this required a vast number of people as well as the means to house, feed and clothe them.  How would this have been accomplished in a tundra?  Food supplies would have had to have been gathered from a prohibitively long distance.  Clothing would have to be extensive considering the temperatures and it would have taken a society advanced and centralized to a degree that they would have left far more traces behind than just 5 pyramids.  

    Of course it could have been aliens or men from Atlantis but then that's just crazy talk.

  4. I would say that it is definitely evidence of an ancient culture. All the evidence points to it being man-made. Most Egyptologists refuse to accept it because they would have to admit they don't have the oldest civilization. It is the same reason they try to deny the true age of Stonehenge.

  5. The Bosnian Pyramid is unquestionably a place with ancient culture on and around a pyramid shape hill. If you look at the facts that exist in which neither the scientist's nor the pyramid theorists doubt you can come to your answer quite easily.

    1. It is a pyramid shaped hill.

    2. The "hill" is littered with artifacts from cultures dating back at least 10,000 years.

    3. The "hill" has human tooled rocks on and around the hill stabilizing it.

    Since there aren't any other pyramids dating back that far and considering the relatively close proximity to Egypt, it is safe to say even if it is not a pyramid in the Egyptian sense it probably was very influential to the first builders of Egypt making it the birthplace of the Pyramid.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 5 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions