One of the more lively shows in Theater Anthropologica has been the debate between those who believe that anatomically modern humans emerged fully-formed out of Africa, eventually replacing the Neanderthal and Erectus populations in Europe and Asia, and those who hold that some ancestors of today's 'humans' coming out of Africa interbred with local species of Homo to give rise to the current diversity of human populations today. The 'one origin, one species'-ists point to a lack of convincing archaeogenetic or archaeological evidence in support of cross-species interbreeding. Some OOA-ers even go as far as to say that recent mtDNA and Y-DNA findings have vindicated them once and for all.
But 'multi-source, multi-species'-ists still persist. To what kinds of evidence (beyond a common-sense notion of 'we know they co-habited, so they must have co-mated') do they appeal? Even if copulation happened, what kinds of evidence show that offspring were indeed produced and were fertile?
Tags: