What makes Liberals think it is O.K to take the money of the rich and give it to the weak, stupid, and lazy?

Question

So that all makes it fair that I pay over $150,000 in taxes (30%) While the uneducated and lazy pay only about 10%, why not introduce a flat income tax???

Answer 1

Without the middle & lower class consumers there is no upper class do your research jackie boy.I suggest you thank the lower classes for your wealth ,you lazy and uneducated little man.

Answer 2

Why makes Conservatives think it is OK to take the money from the middle class and give to rich?

Answer 3

what makes bush think he can take from the poor and give to the rich dont the rich have enough money  

Answer 4

You're extremely ignorant. I hope you don't call yourself a Christian. People use this word too loosely now.

Answer 5

Other older and more rabid liberals?

Answer 6

Not everyone is weak, stupid, and lazy. Some are military vets, others have mental diesases, and some are immigrants. Not everyone has the means to make money easily, go to college, or even get a good job.

Answer 7

"Unto whomsoever much has been given, much is owed."

Answer 8

It comes from their communist leanings, and socialist agenda.

Answer 9

Stupid right wing question

Answer 10

Every heard of socialism. Everyone is equal. That is what Democrats think. They stand up for g**s and illegal immigrants but not for Christianity of any kind and they discriminate against whites(affirmative action).

Answer 11

They should introduce a hate and ignorance tax, you'll pay through the nose.

Answer 12

they don't.

the liberals I see are upset that bush gave away US tax dollars to the likes of halliburton & blackwater.

Answer 13

I totally agree.  I think it is disgusting that we rich people have to pay anything to keep this country afloat.  Make the stupid middle class pay it all.  I am on a trust fund, I have never worked a day in my life.  I have yachts and mansions to support all over the world.  They all have staffs, I have a large collection of Rolls Royces and they all require upkeep, too.  And supporting 10 former wives is not cheap, either!  I need even more tax cuts, that is why I always vote Republican!  Go GOP!

Answer 14

I agree. The top one percent of America pays 40% of Americas taxes, on 20% of America's income. How is that fair?

And the argument "They can afford it" is the biggest load of bull c**p I have ever heard. They could probably afford for you to rob them of a few grand too. Does that make it ok?

Answer 15

What makes conservatives think that pro-choice is evil, but killing thousands of innocent civilians in Iraq is "o.k."  bwahahahahahaha think about that for a minute...hmmmmmm.  lol hehe.  :)

Stupid republicans...lol.

Answer 16

I'm a liberal and I don't feel that way. I do however feel that humans rich or poor, old or young, should have the right to quality medical care. There are people who work hard yet can't afford insurance. I'm all for helping those who help themselves and those in NEED.

What makes cons think it's ok to borrow trillions of $$ for this disgusting, horrific, nonsensical war?

Answer 17

It is "O.K" b/c 1 in 4 of those people fought for your freedom; 6 million of them are elderly who never had access to retirement and 401k's; 64% of them are children under age 5. I know you only care about the military when they GO to war, but someone must care about them when they come home.

Answer 18

After reading you're diatribe, you're obviously weak, stupid, and lazy. So what's your point?

BTW, where in the world did you hear that garbage. Have you been watching the Fox Lie Network again? LOL

You also underscore that republicans would rather kick the crutches from under crippled children than spend a dime to help them.

Answer 19

You do not.  You are not fooling anyone.  1)  Your deductions and all those loop holes you are not going to be paying that.  If you do you need an accountant.  2) Quit whining you are not the only one who has paid such taxes.

But to directly answer your question.  It is called the great depression.  Which effected the whole world.  Now here is a little insight:

As mass production has to be accompanied by mass consumption, mass consumption, in turn, implies a distribution of wealth -- not of existing wealth, but of wealth as it is currently produced -- to provide men with buying power equal to the amount of goods and services offered by the nation s economic machinery. [Emphasis in original.] Instead of achieving that kind of distribution, a giant suction pump had by 1929-30 drawn into a few hands an increasing portion of currently produced wealth. This served them as capital accumulations. But by taking purchasing power out of the hands of mass consumers, the savers denied to themselves the kind of effective demand for their products that would justify a reinvestment of their capital accumulations in new plants. In consequence, as in a poker game where the chips were concentrated in fewer and fewer hands, the other fellows could stay in the game only by borrowing. When their credit ran out, the game stopped.

That is what happened to us in the twenties. We sustained high levels of employment in that period with the aid of an exceptional expansion of debt outside of the banking system. This debt was provided by the large growth of business savings as well as savings by individuals, particularly in the upper-income groups where taxes were relatively low. Private debt outside of the banking system increased about fifty per cent. This debt, which was at high interest rates, largely took the form of mortgage debt on housing, office, and hotel structures, consumer installment debt, brokers' loans, and foreign debt. The stimulation to spending by debt-creation of this sort was short-lived and could not be counted on to sustain high levels of employment for long periods of time. Had there been a better distribution of the current income from the national product -- in other words, had there been less savings by business and the higher-income groups and more income in the lower groups -- we should have had far greater stability in our economy. Had the six billion dollars, for instance, that were loaned by corporations and wealthy individuals for stock-market speculation been distributed to the public as lower prices or higher wages and with less profits to the corporations and the well-to-do, it would have prevented or greatly moderated the economic collapse that began at the end of 1929.

ANOTHER NOTE:  The Republicans have had their way 8 years in the white house and they have had 20 years in the senate....... when they finally got what they wanted house and administration they showed you exactly what their way would do for our country.  Now look at what it has DONE to the country and citizens.

Take a look at the new $5 bill. Our dollar use to be green.  Now they have red in it. The New $5 bill has a HUGE kinda Red 5 on it.  We are getting billions, yes, billions of dollars everyday and NOW our money is marked.  China controls us now.