What makes one a "feminazi"?

Question

Is it the outfits?

The constant smell of burnt bras that lingers in their wake?

Explain.

Answer 1

I think using the term n**i does show weakness in any argument. I know Rush does it tongue in cheek, but I still think it is lame.

Answer 2

An utter lack of a sense of humor; the ability to be offended by pronouns.

Answer 3

Why don't you and other feminists JUST LISTEN TO THE MEN when they talk?  Many of us have suffered at the hands of unfair, s*x biased laws.  When feminists create fair laws, they will no longer be called feminazis.  Btw why do feminists insist "all men are rapists?"  

Extreme feminists are n***s by virtue of their brainwashing of youngsters (children today "inform" on their parents) the hatred against White men and all men taught, a sense of being superior, slogans, chants, ribbons etc, fathers being handcuffed and dragged in the middle of the night away from families, men considered guilty before being innocent, restrict freedom of speech (via politically correct) use Storm Troopers (young women/girls) for social action.

Feminazis want Lebensraum (Africa/Arab countries) believe in Lebensborn (creating superior children using sperm banks) have an Untermensch (today it's men) AND ARE COMMITTING GENDERCIDE.  My brother died because of false domestic violence.  I almost died going thru divorce...many other men are six feet under because of feminism's s*x biased laws.

Today I am a survivor of this Holocaust of men, males.  Jewish law says you kill one generation, you are guilty of killling two generations.  

I have a BA degree in European history.  I've studied a small part of WW2.  If you use n**i methods/tactics, then yes you are a n**i.  I have Jewish relatives.

Answer 4

In order to be a "feminazi," one must be a woman that the average weak-minded Rush Limbaugh listener finds threatening.

In other words, being female and having a brain qualifies you as a "feminazi" in the eyes of most people who use that hackneyed and boring slur.

Answer 5

She is a Radical Feminist. She presses for more rights than men but it is disguized by the word "equality", yet everyone knows her true intentions and those are to make men the equivalent of a canine. She wears flannel on the weekends and a buisness suit on the weekdays. She never shaves her legs because that is what the men want. If she decides to marry and man, he is a weak sissy who bends to her every need. She has no religion because she is god and she eats small children as snacks. She is a Feminazi.

Answer 6

I think Tracey is a prime example.  Notice how hate drips from the words and Rush L. and listeners are bashed really with no provocation.  You have to be Indignant, judgemental, and intolerant.  It has nothing to do with being smart or empowered.  I suppose a red arm band with a 'female' symbol in a white circle would help.

Answer 7

The word “feminazi” is a false construction, a strawfeminist, created to scare people away from the juicy crops of equality, equity and the end of female subjugation.

Answer 8

Do we need to see a guy in a turbin with bombs strapped to him shouting 'Alah Akbar!' before we identify him as a terrorist? I hope not, or we are in trouble. And do we need to see people goosestepping in black uniforms before we can see they are like n***s?

Several points of comparison can be made, mainly regarding:

1/ Feminism is politics: To those who think it isn’t, please recall that feminists have loudly insisted that ‘The personal is political’http://www.feminist.com/askamy/feminism/...

And today feminism is represented in high places in government e.g. the 'Equality' Minister in the UK is also the Deputy Prime Minister i.e. second in command in government.

2/ Prejudice: n***s were prejudiced against Jews and other ‘undesirables’, and feminists are prejudiced against men “the male s*x represents a degeneration and deformity of the female” in 'A Feminist Dictionary' (Kramarae & Treichler, 1985).

3/ Superior race: n***s saw the arian race as superior to other races, and feminists see women as superior to men e.g. "We are, as a s*x, infinitely superior to men" statement by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, quoted in ‘One Woman, One Vote’ (Wheeler 1995, p. 58).

4/ Conspiracy theory of history: n***s created a conspiracy theory about Jews undermining non-Jewish cultures, and likewise feminists have created a conspiracy theory men oppressing women (see Section 6 here http://www.freewebs.com/feminism-evaluat...  

5/ Propaganda: n***s understood the need to control the media in order to promote their views and suppress debate. Feminists too are masters of media manipulation http://www.snopes.com/crime/statistics/s...

6/ Faked evidence: the n***s had the Ahnenerb to generate ‘proof’ of n**i myths, and feminists have Women’s Studies academic departments and courses that produce very questionable ‘facts’ e.g. the lies told about domestic violence at a news conference a few days before Super Bowl Sunday in 1993 http://www.amazon.com/Scrutinizing-Femin...

or http://www.amazon.com/Professing-Feminis...

7/ Censorship and Suppression of debate: n***s used vocal and violent oppression of voices challenging their views, and so do feminists e.g. this footage of feminists disrupting and trying to shut down a forum about battered husbands http://youtube.com/watch?v=qodygTkTUYM   Or the experience of one of the researchers who had threats and the sabotage of her career just because of her findings on the high rate of domestic abuse of men by women: "In an attempt to keep me from speaking... at an American Civil Liberties Union conference... [the ACLU] were told if they allowed me to speak the place would be bombed" (Cook 1997, p.112) in ‘Abused Men'. Westport: Prasger.  Of course political correctness is a more subtle form of censorship http://www.mit.edu/activities/safe/cases...

This tactic works especially well for feminists given that traditionally it is considered unmanly and unfair for a man to deliberately offend a woman.

Should we say nothing rather than risk offending feminists? Yeah, tell that to Carl von Ossietzky: "In 1936, Adolf Hitler was offended with the Nobel Foundation when the 1935 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Carl von Ossietzky, a German writer who publicly opposed Hitler and Nazism". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize...    For me, Carl von Ossietzky should win a prize for pioneering political incorrectness.

8/ State oppression of undesirables: n***s drafted laws to discriminate against Jews, and feminism has done the same (see Section 4 here http://www.freewebs.com/feminism-evaluat...

9/ Legalised theft: n***s stole artworks, property and other valuables from Jews, and feminism promotes harsh divorce settlements based on lies about the distribution of wealth post-divorce told by Lenore Weitzman (1985) http://www.acbr.com/biglie.htm

10/ Final solution: for years the n***s talked about how much better the world would be without Jews and other undesirables; feminists have been doing the same e.g. this from a very prominent and respected British academic, Ann Oakley: "Men are the enemies of women. ...Without men the world would be a better place: softer, kinder, more loving; calmer, quieter, more humane" - (Taking It Like a Woman, 'A French Letter', 1984).  Also, a popular theme today is that men – but not women - are a dead end in evolutionary terms http://iblognews.wordpress.com/2008/01/0... a discussion of this article http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_an...

Also, a popular theme today is that men are no longer necessary except as sperm donors http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment...  

So no, I don't think its the outfits that makes feminists comparable to n***s.

Answer 9

Subscribing to the hateful ideology of post-modern feminism and its inherent misandry, and otherwise hateful (covert) agenda.

Answer 10

I guess having an interest in social engineering, a belief that one gender is superior to the other and supporting or not speaking out against laws that discriminate or give one gender a privilege that the other does not.

I think the comparison is often made in relation to the propaganda that is spread and accepted by many. 1 in 4, wage gap etc.

See misandrist and thumbs up sycophants at the top there!

Trolling today?  :  )

Answer 11

When the ideology overtakes reason and logic as with Jihad's suicide bombers.

They become programmed and brain washed  and act and speak as units of a group rather than free thinking individuals.