What picks would you pick; picks versus picks?

Question

Who would you put in your week 1 fantasy line ups:

Chris Perry versus Willis McGahee (will be rusty for first several weeks)

Chris Cooley versus Greg Olsen (Was is more run oriented this year)

Marc Bulger versus Matt Hasselbeck (Matt will not have played alot)

Nate Burleson versus Mark Clayton

Your thoughts on who you would go with out of these stellar ;) choices is appreciated.

Regards,

Steve

Answer 1

Perry no doubt.

Cooley.

Bulger.

and, Burleson, no doubt.

Answer 2

1) Willis McGahee over Chris Perry - Bengals look beat up and they've got 3 RBs in the mix. I actually have Chris Perry on my team :) Willis is the man in Baltimore even with the injuries. I'm sure he'll be fine.

2) Cooley over Olsen - The Redskins are more run oriented but they're running the West Coast Offense so it's a lot of short quick throws and Cooley did awesome last year. Olsen still isn't proven and the Bears are going to have trouble on offense.

3) Bulger over Hasselbeck (for only the first couple weeks) - Hasselbeck has only missed 9 games in 9 years. His recievers are hurt, he's hurt, but he's still a top 10 QB. Bulger's line is improved but he's still high risk. I'd go Bulger for the first couple games till I see how Hasselbeck does without his top WR.

4) Nate Burleson over Mark Clayton - Nate is now the top dog on the Seahawks because Engram is out. I know I just picked Bulger over Hasselbeck but I think he'll do fine. Clayton has to play behind QB Flacco/Troy Smith and we have no clue what's going to happen with them.

Hope that helps, Steve!

~Mark Lim

www.PoisonApple.com

www.OhSoFat.com

www.Myspace.com/PoisonAppleShirts

Answer 3

These are pretty easy...

Mcgahee, Perry may not be the starter (see K. Watson)

Cooley not even close, Olsen is the #2 TE on the Bears still behind Des. Clark

Bulger...hasselbeck has a bad back and banged up receiving core

Burleson the only healthy WR (see above) and he is pretty good; and Mark Clayton is bad and has no QB