What site is the best for poker?

Question

What site is the best for poker?

Answer 1

you can give it a try at:

http://bestpoker.klikgue.com/

or you can find other at this forum:

http://gamingforum.klikgue.com/

Answer 2

this one

http://www.pokerstars.com/

Answer 3

I play at Pokerstars.

Instant tourney's, possible to earn money from playing free games, lots of qualifiers for their tournaments and the WSOP, WPT, and EPT, some top pro players play there(usually in 2 tourneys at once), it's ALWAYS busy.

A Qualifier with 12,000 openings will usually fill up within an hour easy. You even have to be quick to get into a 45 player Sit&Go sometimes due to so much activity.

Answer 4

Try the iron mongers

Answer 5

pokerstars.....

Answer 6

The two largest are PokerStars and Full Tilt. They are both very reputable and you'll be happy with either. I play at PokerStars myself but have played at pretty much every major site at some point.

PokerStars has a loyalty program which I believe is excellent. FullTilt on the other hand offers rakeback (you get a % of the rake you paid every month refunded to you). Without knowing what limits and volume you intend to play it is impossible to advice as to which is the better deal.

With respect to smaller sites many are legitimate but at the same time others are failing and there are often issues. Players claim the games are easier to beat and they are but the games are easy to beat at all sites so I'd stay away from small unknown sites.

Medium sized sites such as PartyPoker are fine but they are not accepting US players. Avoid Absolute Poker and Ultimate Bet. Absolute Poker was recently involved in a cheating scandal and since they own Ultimate Bet I think both should be avoided.

Answer 7

Thats fulltilt poker. Its one of the biggest online poker sites and specialiazed only in poker. Over 100 000 players play there regulary. You will find a review and a bonus code for fulltilt at http://bestgamblingsites.hit.bg/fulltilt...

Answer 8

If your looking for alot of tables and guaranteed games every day with lots of people in them for full tilt or Pokerstars.

If your going to play alot use pokerstars if you think you can play enough to get to their supernova VIP level as it gives you about 30% rake back.

Poker stars also accept British Debit card deposits in sterling and will withdraw it in sterling also so you won;t be hit by your banks exchange rates that usually sap about 11% of your winnings.

If your not going to play fulltime every week use Full Tilt as you can sign up for rakeback there without having to play thousands of hands every day.

If you don't care about having good software and traffic and your only going to play one table at a time perhaps try pacific as the players there are the worst on the web as they tend to get signed up through 888.coms casino site so you will be up against gamblers rather than proper poker players.

Answer 9

I am an actual player who has been playing online for 5 years now.  I have played in just about every cyber poker room there is.  As for the blogs, chat rooms, etc... every online poker room is dog cused, mainly by people  who have no clue as to what they are doing.  They complain about how bad the cards are and then post their hand histories, and the vast majority of them are just playing horrible poker, it isn't that the site has some how entered into a conspiracy against them (which is what they claim). One thing that alot of people don't consider when they make  these accusations is that you are seeing 3 to 4 times the hands played when just playing one table online that you do in a actual brick and mortar card room (not to mention multi tabling) so what are normally short term trends off line card playing are condenced and seem really apparent, that is just the random element that exists in cards.  There is also a heck of alot more bad play online than in face to face games, coupled with the accelerated hands you are seeing in an hours time, I could see how it would appear that way to people who play poker every now and  then.  One other point, the people who are always complaining online are those with micro bankrolls who were introduced to poker only online and have not been playing for years.  

As with just about every comercial endevor out there, tons jump into the business, and the best rise to the top and control the market.  There used to be 4 sites the controled the market for US players, they were party poker, poker stars, full tilt and absolute.  Party poker no longer takes US players and has suffered in what is offered by them as a result.  Absolute has recently undergone a major "cheater" scandal and has suffered as a result.  Poker stars has also recently had a spat of cheating, however, they imediately nipped it in the bud (unlike absolute, who thought denial was a river) .

Poker stars handled their problem and kept the players trust.  Of the four major players of 2 years ago, only poker stars and full tilt still have a large following in the US. This is important when trying to determine an online room to deposit money in.

(I haven't discussed ultimate bet, bodog, doyles room etc, they never had a large share of the market, and suffer as a result).  The reason for this is first off, variety, no online poker room offers the variety of games spread, tournament buy ins, satelites to real casino tournaments, and shear opportunaties per hour as full tilt and poker stars.  The next reason is customer support, I have had to use online and telephonic support in about every room I have played in and those two (along with party poker when I could play there) were the most helpful.  Another reason is cashing out, at some time I assume you wish to access the money you win, I have never had a problem getting money from poker stars and full tilt (and once again party poker when I played there), other poker rooms, unless things have changed, were nearly impossable to get your money in a timely manner (with poker stars, full tilt and party poker my money is in my bank account the same day).  

I prefer full tilt, and my g/f prefers poker stars, we both play on both sites and either one of these sites would be my suggestion, I would actually advise to open an account on both of them and make your own decission.  Good luck.

Answer 10

poker = http://www.doylesroom.com/ period !!!

Answer 11

aim me at bhs0685 and i can set you up with rakeback

Answer 12

Depends how much you want to spend.

I use http://www.freeonlinepokergame.co.uk

Answer 13

My faves in order are

FullTilt

DoylesRoom

UltimateBet (distant 3rd)

I use all of these sites and I enjoy each of them for different reasons.  Use bonus code RIVER88 for their top bonus packages for new depositors.

Answer 14

I'd recommend PokerStars or Full Tilt.  Like others have said, they are the two biggest poker rooms and are pretty much going to have the game you want to play at any time throughout the day.  Check http://dagus-statistics.com/reviews.htm for a comprehensive review of each of these sites and others that haven't been mentioned yet.  You'll also find bonus codes to each site's best current bonus as well as tips on how to deposit and withdraw.  Hope this helps.

Answer 15

WOW, almost every site that talks about different poker sites, they all say Full Tilt is the WORST. This is coming from the players in the chat rooms, not the reviewers. It has by far the most unreal cards anywhere. I will never go back to Full Tilt again.

Pokerstars is the biggest and best right now. They have great tournament selections, Sit and go's, ring games and a great program to go along with it.

The funnest site I've ever played is at Poker.com which you have to go through carbonpoker.com to get to. They use these smiley faces that make the game very enjoyable. There only downfall is its a small site with not alot of tourneys to choose from.

Ultimate Bet is by far the SLOWEST of them all. Its ok, just very slow.

Go to railbirds.com   its a poker site where people chat about poker. Just take a look at how many people hate Full Tilt.

When it comes to reviews, DO NOT listen to the reviewers, listen to the acctual players. The reviewers get paid by the sites. You can tell the REAl players from the bad ones/newbies.

Answer 16

As has been mentioned by a few posters, Poker Stars is not bad. They're not perfect by any means but they do the job. You can reach them here:

http://www.free-cash-casino.com/online-p...

Answer 17

When I look for a poker site I look for 3 things.

-How many players are online?

- What size is the sign up bonus

- Does the site offer rakeback?

Many poker players are playing month after month without getting any rakeback - each time they play a hand the contribute to the site by paying a small rake.

Some sites are offering rakeback and that means that you can get a piece of the cake every month.

That can be a lot of free money in the long run.

Answer 18

I like partypoker.com