We had a loss at our new home under construction. Under "insured location" in our policy, it clearly spells out a definition as a residence under construction to be used as a primary residence for the insured, which this was. But the insurance co comes back with a denial, saying that it is not the "intent" of the policy to cover such a loss. I have been over and over the policy, and I feel sure that if sued, they would cover, but as we don't have the cash up front, we would like a lawyer that would take it on contingency.
Tags: