What would be better to decrease global warming... Cremation or Burial?

Question

Crematorium furnace's spew CO2

burial takes up space, but I would be recycled into the earth...

What should I do?

WWAGD?

Answer 1

um i think getting cremade is part of global warming. why are you asking this question?

Answer 2

Why don't you call Richard Branson and have him shoot you into space at a speed greater than 11.2 km/s.  He sells environmentally friendly JATO rocket packs.  Yves Rossy can also help you.

Burt Rutan designed a multi stage re-usable casket with 8g acceleration.  It even has a complimentary set of SASE Neil Young furry lamb chops.

Answer 3

Think outside the box. Go green.  Burial, that is.

Answer 4

Burial would be best.  Someday, we'll be powering somebody's car, in a few million years.

Have fun

Answer 5

The totally green environmental funeral is to be buried straight into the ground with biodegradable cloth or cardboard around the body.  The burial takes place in a park or wood land area known as an "eco-cemetery".  A tree is planted over the burial site to contribute to the environment and as a  remembrance.

Answer 6

Cremation

Answer 7

burial i guess..... o.O

Answer 8

Al Gore would need to be burned... he takes up too much space to bury

Answer 9

Go to the North Pole

Feed a polar bear, they're starving

Answer 10

why are there so many jerk responses? it's a perfectly valid question.

Answer 11

If the question is just GW then burial is the answer.

However if you are being buried in the conventional way of non-biodegradable chemical preservatives, then you are really not returning to the earth, then what makes matters worse, is here in the US we pour millions of gallons of water onto our chemically stewed corpses that leach the toxic water into our water tables.

Answer 12

Burial at sea