What would happen if they opened the debates?

Question

What if they opened the debates to a third candidate (one with large support), instead of listening to the same from 2 candidates that differ so little that it won't affect many people when it comes to voting. If they opened up the debate would that mean the 2 top parties might actually have to change some of their ideas because the third party might bring them to the forefront of the American public? The 2 parties brainwash you and take sides to two issues that really mean nothing and aren'tt different in policies, only that one party will bankrupt us faster than the other but from the looks of that the line is starting to become blurry.

Answer 1

We would get a lot more ideas and wouldn't have to listen to Obama stutter so much and rspond to questions that they were "Above his pay grade."

Answer 2

Sorry dude...I like what Ron Paul has to say, but if you go re-read history, you and your team will hand someone an election this fall.  Go see the havoc that the "hand grenade with a bad hair cut" from Texarkana did to elect Bill Clinton in 1992.  

That whooshing sound is your money being swiped from your wallet from the Obama gang!

Answer 3

They did that.... remember Ross Perot? we saw what fiasco that became.