What would happen to the Royalty section if "cut and paste" Wikipedia answers were not allowed?

Question

Do you think that disallowing Wikipedia as the only source would improve the Royalty section. Thanks!

Answer 1

I never cut and paste my answers. I would like to see more original answers from people instead of Wikipedia answers.

Answer 2

Wiki answers aren't reliable and I don't depend on it, I always like to see at least one other source.  Doubt if YA will ever be free of Wiki, it's too easy for those who don't really think about the question they are answering.

Answer 3

better

Wiki is full of inaccuracies

When someone uses them for a reference, I ignore them

Answer 4

I think it would grind to a bloody great halt all round "answers" and not just royalty

Answer 5

Rachelle wouldn't have a job.

Answer 6

People who answer from their own knowledge would get more Best Answers.

Answer 7

Yes, people wouldn't ask a question if they could read the answer on wiki.

Answer 8

lmao! The first answerer took my answer HAHAHAHHAHA!!!

Answer 9

One or two people would lose top contributor status in the Royalty category if it did happen,especialy if their friends stopped voting for them.

Answer 10

there would probably be another top contributor up there!

Answer 11

It would be nice to see answers from people who have read about the topics and not just looked them up in Wikipedia. I think disallowing Wikipedia as the only or main source would be worth a shot, however, I doubt it will ever happen. Interesting question!

Wonder what the Wikipedia answer will be on this question?