Question:

When a terrorist nukes America what will happen?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

America has 70% of Europeans considering the US the biggest threat to global security, an almost non existent Southern border, puts warships up and down an international free zone where the only possible enemy is Canada! Meddle with everyone's affairs in a totally arrogant and incompetent way. When it happens what will America do? You have not exactly held yourself in good stead with many friends and have not learned bullying tactics don't work after 9/11 (Bin Laden is still out there, his sympathy grows while global anti-US sentiment increases). Can America avoid this fate? Or is it destined to destroy itself?

 Tags:

   Report

13 ANSWERS


  1. it seems as though the Grand Plan of the Neo-Cons is to make way for The New World Order or Die~!

    so Vote or Die~!


  2. I doubt if anybody's going to nuke the US.

    Bio-warfare is a possibility - you'll lose a small city, maybe.

    You kill that many people in 6 months with your gun culture in any case - it'll be a small blip.

    I do think the situation is not as hopeless as you paint it, though.

  3. who moved your rock ?

  4. Thank you, Kitten.

  5. I assume this question was written by someone who doesn't speak English as a first language.

    1. The author is clearly not American, hence not knowing about the southern border (no need for a capital on southern). I'm inclined to think the author is English (hence the "foreigners invading from the south line" - a simplistic banal view to take).

    2. "Bin Laden's sympathy grows?" Who is he sympathetic to? Why do we care?

    3. Is America destined to destroy itself? A little alarmist don't you think? Do you care?

    4. Why is Rag1975 so worried about "Rouge states?"

    A little pink isn't going to hurt anyone. The more make-up everyone wears the more jovial everyone will be, surely!

  6. I think this is overstated and extremely paranoid.

  7. Belgium is the biggest threat to world security  

  8. The person asking this Q has a point.

    When 9/11 occurred - there were an estimated 300 people prepared to join Al Qada.

    For every person that gets killed - you must create 100 enemies. For all the muslims humiliated in Abu Ghraib you create more hatred.

    There must be thousands, tens of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands who want revenge.

    Sooner or later one of them is going to get hold of something nasty.

    How you counter this is difficult to tell. They must have people in America just blending in with population. Maybe if America apologised for what it has done - people might chnage their views.

  9. 70% of Europeans are all set to change their opinion since the Georgian action by Russia. The US is headed toward becoming Europe's only hope to survive.



  10. Global anti-US feelings are over-stated. take little ol' Blighty, for example - most of the populace thinks (generally) fondly about America, and the government can't do enough to keep on their good side.

    It'd be foolish to suggest that some people do not percieve (rightly or wrongly) problems with the American model - the manner in which business plays such a large role in government, for example - but very few people (mostly just the uber-liberals, really) actually hate the country.

    Do you have any data to back up your claims?



  11. Look for the Zionists.

    To those who bothered to look into the whole event  realize that it was they who were the key players in the false flag attack of 9/11.

    see "five dancing isrealis" "odigo +9/11" "urban moving systems" and that's only for starters.


  12. I think we should look at America's foreign policy under George W Bush in  a balanced way. While Bush's popularity and that of the USA has declined over the last 8 years I believe that history will show that many of America's concerns about 'rouge' states were valid.

    Unfortunately the USA has become the only super power (although I suspect this will be China's century). The USA with the support of the UK has attempted to be the World Police in trying to make the world a more democratic and safer place. I think this might have backfired in the short term because most people would probably agree that the world is a more dangerous place today than it was at the start of this century. However, this is partly because other leading governments have failed to support America's lead.

    A good example is the current crisis in Georgia between the democratically elected administration and the bullying from Russia. European countries are failing to support Georgia and the Mr Bush's position as much as is required because they are concerned that Russia might cut off gas supplies to Europe.

    This issue makes it very clear to me that countries need to be as self reliant as possible for their own energy. Having to rely on Russia puts us in a difficult situation to negotiate on other issues.

    While I do think America needs a more compelling foreign policy story for the G7 I also think it's time to level the playing field, reform the UN and NATO and give a proper voice to democratic nations to push communist countries such as China to improve in areas such as human rights.

    We (the UK and the rest of the democratic world) need a strong America to stand up to China, Russia, Korea, Iran etc.

  13. well china is the biggest threat to global security with the overpopulation but since america has so many nukes about 2 more scientists say there will be a new ice age, and if we get nuked there is no other way except nuking them back becuase we cant afford to be bombed.

    this is the reason america doesnt want to fight russia, because they have atomic bombs as well and has a good military, the world tries to stay away from using atomic bombs

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 13 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions