When did calling someone a Hillary supporter become an insult??

Question

I

Question : Why do Republicans claim to oppse a "nanny state" yet want their government to protect them from terrorists?

Question Details : You can't have it both ways, can you? Isn't expecting your government to provide security exactly as bad as expecting your government to provide money?

Deleted Answer : Um....it's the Federal government's job to have and maintain a military to protect the people. It is also their job to create and maintain an infrastructure (i.e. roads). But it is NOT their job to pay for your medical care. Nor is it their job to pay provide you with food or housing or any other charity. This is such a stupid question. What, are you FOR a nanny state? Your adamant position that Republicans are hippocrates for opposing it, makes me assume that you support it. In which case, your mindset is what is wrong with this country. I have no doubts that you think Hillary Clinton will be the savior of the United States.

Violation Reason :Insulting Other Participant

Answer 1

A:  Calling someone a Hillary supporter MIGHT have become an insult when the ILLEGAL MEXICAN census was at a mere 5,894,231 (not including those unborn in the hospital waiting to pop out and be counted for future ESL and head-start programs....)  note: please be kind, it could be +/- a million or two based on the government facts.....

Answer 2

no, expecting your government to provide security is not as bad as expecting your government to provide money?

the reasoning is simple, you just need to work hard enough for you to earn the money you wanted. but there is no way you can defend against a terrorist attack by yourself right?

you just need to be punctual for office, and you get paid, but you cant just say "please dont carry a bomb to my home door" and expect the suicide bombers to do what you wanted.

thus, you can ask the gov to strengthen the security at the airports, but you should not ask the gov to spoonfeed you with cash on a regular basis.

Answer 3

lol yep,i got it for saying amen! i also got it for calling abortion murder,suspension! i have had another suspension for calling a comment that was the worst i've ever seen on here with swear words and all for calling the"question" pathetic! .they constantly suspend any right leaning answerer on here.lol. yeah good ole' honest yahoo.3 other suspensions with absolutely no violations per there agreement with out any comment on what it even was with absolutely no reply after several attempts to get it.

Answer 4

Well, for one thing I didn't see Hillary mentioned in the question at all.  Did you?  If you conservatives would stop bringing up Hillary and Bill in every answer, regardless pf the question, you might not get violated so much.

Answer 5

It wasn't that you call them a Hillary supporter. You said their question  was stupid and then you became condescending. Your answer was more like a rant. That is why he reported it you.

Answer 6

I think that when one deliberately asks an insulting question it is only fair that the answer be in kind.

Since this is Yahoo, however, that only applies to insults about the left.

Perjorative questions or answers about the right are acceptable

I think it would be a good idea for all of us , when Yahoo shows its Left leanings, switch from Yahoo to aonther site. Gio to Comcast or some other site which isn't so partisan.

If we hit Yahoo in the pocketbook, where it hurts, maybe they'll can the jerk who runs the forum and get someone with both sides of his brain.

Answer 7

I'd say it was probably the "This is such a stupid question" comment might have done it, but you never know.  The people supporting the losing candidate might be getting their panties in a bunch over the fact that the coronation of Queen Hillary may be permanently cancelled.