When will this war in Iraq be over? Do we have to kill everyone to get our point across?

Question

When will this war in Iraq be over? Do we have to kill everyone to get our point across?

Answer 1

No we don't just the terrorist should all be killed.

It should be noted that the Nazislamic Terrorist are killing the most. Muslim killing Muslim. What a wonderful, peaceful religion

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."

Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."

Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."

Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"There is no doubt that... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."

Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."

Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."

Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."

Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and developing weapons of mass destruction."

Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."

Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."

Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."

Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."

Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...

Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.

Answer 2

there is no "war" in iraq. the fight is over ideals and forcing a certain way of life on a country that is totally unprepared for it and no amount of military force,with the exception of nuclear weapons, is ever going to change that,

Answer 3

It will be all over if we are all dead. No people no war. No US invasion, no needless death and suffering for the people of iraq. The US have manipulated the WMD report to go on into war.

Answer 4

And what point would that be? That we can invade a country with lies and then kill as many innocent men, women, and children as we want and still think we are the good guys.

Answer 5

Yep, you nailed it, your pretty smart!

Answer 6

Yes, but there are options. Options which our representatives in Congress are blind to and will never see!

Max

peacenegotiator

Answer 7

When George Bush "finds" the weapons of mass destruction.

That is, after all, the ONLY reason we were given for going there.

Answer 8

I guess that's up to the terrorists if they would stop their assinine behavior and let the government get formed then the war will finally be over for us at least but until that happens stay the course!!!

Answer 9

The war in Iraq goes on as long as the war on "terrorism". Since the Senate passed a resolution declaring Iran's army a terrorist organization(Hillary voted for it too), expect the war on terror to go on forever. Or at least until Armaggedon.

If people don't vote for someone to end war, we have turned a corner with no return. War with no end.

Answer 10

That is one way.

Answer 11

And exactly what point are you trying to get across?

g-day!

Answer 12

No not at all !!!

I don't think so that war in Iraq will stop when we killed every terrorist.U know who is tarriest? U and i are tarriest and we make tarriest.So first control the terr ism after that we will achieve our goal to stop the war in Iraq right.Some people fight to each other on the behalf of Religion and Casts u know.And if we killed one tarriest then so many tarriest were born instantly.So just first control the tarriest activity and teach Innocent people that what is right and what is wrong right.After that might be possible that the war will stop in the Iraq.

Thanks