Where did the energy come from to pulverize all of the concrete in the collapse of WTC 1,2 & 7?

Question

If you remember most of the debris was taking away in 5 gallon buckets.

The people who started examining the evidence and asking questions were the victims families not anti-American conspiracy theorists set to uproot the ideals of America.

Since the victims families couldn't investigate all on their own they asked for and took assistance where ever they could. Since then 130+ Senior military officials, 500+ Architects and engineers, 120+ Pilots and aviation professionals, 260+ Professors, 210+ Survivors and family members, 140+ Artists, entertainers, and media professionals have joined the fight questioning the evidence.

Are all these people looney or wrong?

http://patriotsquestion911.com/

Answer 1

pancake effect at the point of damage

Answer 2

I too, have spent many hours perusing the "evidence" in the conspiracy theories and I just don't buy it because it makes absolutely no sense.

If you have not taken the time to look at the other side, here ya go.

http://www.debunking911.com/

I don't see how "intelligent" people can believe an administration could in only 8 months, plan, execute and successfully cover up those acts and I definitely can't see where people who believe that Bush has not done anything else right in 7.75 years can possibly believe he is the "genious" behind it.

When and if any of the "conspirators" own up to the act and produce "Watergate" type evidence, it is just totally unbelievable.

There are plenty of facts to the contrary, from physical, scientific, engineering, photographic, videographic and absolutely none which supports the conspiracy theories.

I turned on the TV that morning and saw the first tower struck burning.

I woke my wife up and told her something terrible had just happened, without knowing exactly what had happened.

We both sat, astonished and angry, watching as the second aircraft struck the 2nd tower.

The speed of that aircraft approaching the building is best described as higher than "cruising" speed. The force imparted to very few floors was far and away above what the building was designed to withstand.

I'm not an engineer, but it doesn't take one to know that if any of those damaged floors gave way, the weight above it would bring the whole building down.

Both buildings lasted longer than I thought they could.

Believe what you want but if your intent is to make all believe as you, some proof is all we ask.

Don't have any, don't bother again till you do.

The force involved in pulverizing the concrete is called gravity.

Answer 3

Incorrect, the WTC was not designed to survive impact by 2 fully fuel loaded jumbo jets.

Answer 4

Yep loony, wrong or taken out of context. I see every hour right here in Y A that Bush is dumb as a rock yet so many want us to believe he or his administration is involved in the largest cover up in history and making it work.

These people can't even tap a phone without someone talking.

And there are too many witnesses to the pentagon plane.And we all saw 2 of the other planes. And yes the damage done to the buildings was more than sufficient to bring them down.

Answer 5

Because the government did it. It was hit by a plane each but that alone would not make those buildings drop. They were demoed just like on that show. How did building # 7 just out of the blue fall, completely. Look on you tube, (zeitgeist). Or type in 911 and you will see bombs going off. No debris at all at the pentagon or the one that crashed in the field. Weird huh?

Answer 6

Oh NOES even the entertainers believe the theory!!

It must be true!

My mind must not be open enough I am stooopid.

Now where did I put that documentation that says that the concrete was taken away in 5 gallon buckets. I swear I just set it down.... hmmm.

Answer 7

Two fully fueled jumbo jets!!

Answer 8

So, about 1000 people who want their 10 minutes of fame are banding together out of 300 MILLION AMERICANS!  

They are looney AND wrong.

I have looked several websites, and hours of their conspiracy theory c**p.  One example of their stupidity.  The Rosie O'Donnell claim that fire has never melted steel:  The steel did not have to MELT, it just had to be weakened due to heat, and the weight would have done the rest.