Question:

Which McMahon was more interesting to watch back in 2000-2004?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

S.U.D 9508.......

 Tags:

   Report

11 ANSWERS


  1. yea.. 100% right he has lost his touch since 06..


  2. Stephanye McMahon; I really liked Stephanie's feud with Sable.

  3. lol, Stphanie and Shane McMahon. They had a lot to do with WWF being good

  4. all of them they all were involved it made the show interesting sometimes the mcmahons made the show more interesting

  5. STE[HANIE MCMAHON WHEN SHE WAS HOT

  6. Both Stephanie and Shane

    Shane went hardcore fighting big guys once, like kurt angle etc.

    Stephanie because she had an awesome roll in the triple h and test love storyline. And also when she became the HOT manager of smackdown.

  7. I still say VKM, no matter heel or face, he is still fun to watch xD!

  8. Stephanie McMahon.

    I liked the McMahon/Helmsley era. she played the character perfectly.

    Many funny moments between her, y2j, angle and the rock.

  9. all them back then it waz fun

  10. Actually, The Attitude Era ended aroud 2001, not 1999. It ended when WWF took over WCW and ECW, and changed it's name from WWF to WWE.

  11. s***w 2000-2004 how bout 1997-1999 the foundation of the attitude era b*****s

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 11 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.