Which Wedding ring do you like? (pics inside)?

Question

Which of these wedding ring sets do you prefer?

http://i2.iofferphoto.com/img/item/416/096/61/34881577_tp.jpg

http://cdn.overstock.com/images/products/L11217140a.jpg

Please say which one you like best and why. Also please let me know if you think the bands should be thicker / thinner..but overall which design looks best

Answer 1

I really like the first set with the stones around the wedding band, it's really nice. It has more character then the other one. But if your style is more sleek, then i would go for the other one. Good Luck!  

Answer 2

i prefer the second set.  

classy, striking & with only one diamond - you really take notice of it.

If you have longer fingers, a thicker width is OK.  If you have petite hands I say thinner.

Answer 3

The first one by far. It's just more elegant and feminine. The second one looks too thick and rough for a woman's hands. I don't think a band should be too thin (remember you may want to wear it alone sometimes) but not as thick as the second one either.

All the best.

Answer 4

They both look great! Here's my opinion of both:

The first one:

Very shiny, and diamonds are a girl's best friend! But, too many diamonds can be a little overwhemling for some people. As for the bands, the width is fine!

The second one:

Just like the first one, it's shiny. With the sleek, silver bands, it's very contemporary! Some girls like a lot of diamonds, some don't! As for the bands, the width is perfect.

Good luck in finding the perfect one, but I suggest finding out what style she likes best before buying it for her!

Answer 5

i absolutely love the first one.  just everything about it is beautiful.  i always have liked the thinner band than the thicker one.  

Answer 6

Personally they're way to big...and goddy. I don't like the settings but the first one would be great if the diamond was only a .5 to a 1.0. The bands look nice, good size, not too wide.

Answer 7

aha about wedding ring  i would prefer a golden  ring  and not this type of silver fashionable ring .  wedding ring is worn  till the end of life. so i prefer you go for a simple plain gold ring.... good luck

Answer 8

Defiantly the first one. its shiny and sophisticated but if you want a unique then the 2ed one is nice.

Answer 9

The first one is much more delicate, I like it much better than the thick, modern one.

Answer 10

both are great choices.

i prefer the second one, but with a thinner band. just due to the fact that i like minimal; simple, clean lines.  

Answer 11

I like the first one because it's more delicate and feminine. Anyone with smaller hands would have a hard time carrying off the second ring.

Answer 12

I like the first one better.  Something looks wrong about the second one - it has such a wide band.  I like the additional stones on the side of the first one.

Answer 13

I prefer the first one because the band is not to thick.  I prefer the thinner bands.

But both beautiful, CONGRATS!

Answer 14

Deffinetely the first one. I think the bands are fine. I think the diamond would look better in princess cut but I like the diamonds in the band it makes it look classier. White gold looks better with diamonds than yellow gold.

Answer 15

The first one is lovely but the second one in yellow gold would show off the stone beautifully...

I don't dislike the platinum or white gold but prefer yellow gold against diamonds...

Answer 16

i think the first one is very nice, it sparkles in the light, and its bands arent vry thick, u dont want thick bands.

the second one is nice, but i think the bands are WAY 2 thick, and that they look very plain compared to the other one, so, choose the the first one!

the reason i say dont get thick bands is becuz then, if ur finger is not very long, it uncomfortable to make a fist or bend that ring finger.

wutevr u choose, gud luck with ur wedding!

Answer 17

It is your finger, your wedding and your memento of your promise.  what do you like?

If you want an opinion - get the biggest and most expensive then you can then pawn it for more money in our failing economy!!

Seriously choose what you really like - matching rings are really nice - especially if you are still together in 40 years time.  good luck.

Answer 18

the second one the first one looks way too overdone and almost fake.

Now i love the thick band on the second one two but you need long thin figures for that.  If your figures are short you might want slimmer bands.

Answer 19

I like the first one better. It seems like in the second one the dimond is just there. But in the first one it blends in really well with the rest of the ring. I love it!!

Answer 20

I like the first one it is the same as mine except I don't have the diamonds on the side of my engagement ring...as far as the thickness it really goes by how big your finger is...but my choice is for a smaller thickness..good luck

Answer 21

Really both of them are beautiful.  

If I had to choose, I would take the second, more simple one with the single diamond.  One benefit of this set is that there is less to worry about in everyday life, like getting food stuck in the diamonds while doing the dishes, or catching them on whatever you may be able to catch them on.  You won't have to take them off every time you move. Plus, a solitary diamond is classy.  The bands on the engagement and wedding rings could be a bit thinner to be more delicate and less chunky.

Either way, you are going to have gorgeous rings.  Hope this helps!

PS, with the second one, you can get matching wedding bands with your husband.

Answer 22

I really like the second one...

the first one is nice, but looks really traditional...

I like the boldness of the second design...it is a little thicker, but I like it!

there is just something about platinum that really makes it stand out!!

Answer 23

I would prefer the first one because it's nice.The second one doesn't look bad either but compared to the first it looks plain.

Answer 24

Definitely the first one. Very similar to mine except mine is a princess cut. The band is exactly like mine. The first one is just elegant and gorgeous!!! The second one, I don't like one thing about it. It's too plain.

Answer 25

The 1st because that is my wedding set. I get compliments on it all the time. It's a timeless look too. I don't have the diamonds going all the way around the bands They stop half way around but it doesn't matter since you rarely see the palm of my hand. My center stone isn't that big and it has six prongs in the setting. More like this one (mine isn't from Tiffanys)

http://www.tiffany.com/Engagement/Item.a... (add the bead band wedding band to the ring)

Answer 26

I prefer the first one, but I'd rather a smaller center stone to be more proportional with the rest of the ring. I do love the overall look of it though.

Answer 27

I am torn because I like diamonds on the bands of rings, but for some reason I like the second one. I think because the diamond in the second ring appears to be higher quality than the first ring.  

Answer 28

I like the first one but I am a big stone fan!  Just some added sparkle and less a chance of seeing scratches!

Overall thinner bands may be more comfortable so you don't have so much on one finger, but the best way of knowing it trying them on

Answer 29

the second one, because i think there is beauty in brevity.

the first one is too showy, the surrounding diamonds, while a sign of wealth, inherently "hide" and draw attention away from the main piece.  while the second one, is simple, yet direct.  it also seems to be better built.

make the bands as thick or thin as you want, comfort is key

Answer 30

First one definitly. Thinner Band.

Answer 31

The first one because it looks feminine and more dainty than the other because it is narrow.  I love it.  Congratulations!!!!.  I am jealous.