Question:

Which entertains you the most? WWE or TNA?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Describe.. like TNA has better wrestling or WWE has better storylines.. etc..

 Tags:

   Report

14 ANSWERS


  1. wwe


  2. tna.

    better storylines and wrestling.

  3. I agree with your example. I think TNA has more exciting action, but I think there storylines are horrid, whereas the action can be hit or miss on WWE bit their stories always keep me intrigued and entertained. I usualluy flip around between matches on TNA, while when watching WWE I usually watch all the promos and then watch the first minute of matches to see whether or not I should stick around.

  4. TNA is all wrestling and not many storylines

    on the other hand WWE has alot of storylines and more superstars

    probably who wins this is the 1997-2000  WWF !!!!! the storylines and wrestlers were the best there was

    rip wwf(e)- 1997-2000

  5. WWE cuz its been there for way longer than TNA and even though it curently lacks of good talent, it will become better in 1 or 2 years because the new wrestlers in WWE will develop their skills and give us a show that TNA can never even dream of providing to the fans...

    oh and all the good stars in TNA were in WWE, so you have to admitt that WWE produces the great ones... then its up to WWE or the wrestlers themselves to decide whether they stay in WWE or leave...


  6. WWE has better production and is just more entertaining to me. I've always been a WWE fan since I was a kid so I'm biased. I watch TNA here and there but can't get into it like I do WWE.

  7. WWE has better storylines,

    but TNA is more creative with weapons and have more hardcore matches...

    But im still gonna have to go with WWE, because if you catch them on a good PPV, you'll get great wrestling and great hardcore action!

  8. TNA all the way it has better action the wrestling is better and plus they are PG-13 while WWE has gone to being G or PG. So TNA is way better because unlike with WWE it is more brutal the wrestlers also have more time to recover and you get to see blood and WWE doesn't show that anymore.

  9. wwe is stupid for going pg thats a dumb move we are no longer gonna see somebody bleed no longer gonna see cursing no longer gonna see a good story line i hope wwe goes bankrupt because they are retarded for going pg hey why not move them to the Disney channel and have hanna montana on  

  10. WWE. TNA sucks and they copy like everything from the WWE.

    TRUE KENNEDICT RIGHT HERE ♥

    I ♥ Mr. Kennedy

  11. TNA Wrestling wise is most entertaing more athletic superstar than WWE but more storyline backstage action and hypewise WWE

  12. wwe but they need competition.

  13. WWE by far.It's way better than TNA.Anybody that thinks TNA is good or better or on par seriously needs to get their head out of TNA's a$$,is really f'd up,or is on something.

  14. TNA

    better athletes and more wrestlin = better show

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 14 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.