Which hit was worse? solomon on ling? or hall on staker?

Question

Which hit was worse? solomon on ling? or hall on staker?

Answer 1

**I think that the Hall/Staker incident looked worse but Ling certainly came off worse after Solomon's elbow.**

Answer 2

Worse from an entertainment perspective? or you mean 'my bad' worse? heh..

Well halls was the worse brain f**t ive seen in a while but mighty entertaining..

Solomons was dirtier cos Ling never had a chance to see it comen..

Answer 3

Ling required surgery Staker didn't.     I believe the worst hit can only be judged by how the players are effected long term.   Staker has been in and out of the team, with reports he has totally lost confidence.  If the hit ultimately effects either  players career, or their longevity in the game, surely nothing could be 'worse' than that !

Answer 4

I say take a look at some of the work from Dermott, Arch, Rhys-Jones, Weightman or Captain Blood!

Has the game really become this soft???

Answer 5

Halls HIT on Staker was worse.

Solomons INJURY on Ling was worse.

Answer 6

hall on staker.

Answer 7

Halls was worse

Answer 8

Hmmm.  

I think that Hall's was worse because it was more cowardly.  Well behind play, and his instant reaction was to try to pretend he hadn't done it.  

Solomon certainly caused more damage, but at least he had the balls to realise that what he had done was totally feral straight away.

Answer 9

I think the 'hall on staker' one was worse.

solomon just took advantage of an incoming collision.... (did anyone else think that seeing Ling do the 180 spin in the air was cool?! haha)

where as hall.... just turned around and knocked the guy out.

but i think Ling definatley got off worse for wear.

Answer 10

Ling came off worse than Staker, but Hall's hit was purely in cold blood. Hall knew exactly what he was doing and it was premeditated.

Not to say that Solomon's wasn't. Hall's hit however, was different because he just blatantly punched Staker in the face. They were both shocking though. Good question.

Answer 11

Have to be Soloman as Hall only hit a West Coke player so that doesn't really count

Answer 12

Solomon on Ling for sure! Has a broken cheek bone now.

Answer 13

worse as in 'worse for the game' then it would go to Hall, who pretty much turned around and knocked staker out lol.

worse as in 'left the most damage', that would go to Solomon on Ling. Staker still had a concusion from the shot, but ling has a fractured jaw i think?

Answer 14

hall

he is but ugly can u imagine staker seeing halls face and fist at the same time

Answer 15

Hall on staker. Soloman was more painfull but more part of the game rules.

But i agree with louise marie. BRING BACK THE BIFF!

Answer 16

I reckon Solomons was worse as Ling got a fractured cheekbone but hall should've gotten at least 10 weeks. Ling always knew he was going to get contact (not to the extent he got but he was always going to get hit)  where as Staker didn't know Hall was going to turn around and belt him.

As a Cats supporter i reckon Solomon is an idiot coz i love lingy but Hall should've got more then solomon

Answer 17

hall on staker

but ling got injured longer.

Answer 18

I think Hall on Staker was worse but he got 7 weeks whereas Solomon got 8 weeks. Staker was out cold but Ling managed to get up. So it's hard to say.

Answer 19

Hall's was much crueler but staker wasnt so badly injured, i hope lingy gets back soon coz we'll miss him when vsing dogs and hawks