Which is MORE ludicrous, abstinence as a means of birth control OR diplomacy with know terrorist?

Question

Which is MORE ludicrous, abstinence as a means of birth control OR diplomacy with know terrorist?

Answer 1

abstinence for a sexually active 17 year old

Answer 2

Abstinence, it doesn't work.  There is a natural human need to procreate.  

Answer 3

MORE    Ludicrous would be Odrama being president of America. Now that is ludicrous !    bd

Answer 4

Abstinence.

Answer 5

diplomacy with known terrorists.  Especially when it is their religious conviction to kill all who don't agree with them.  (non believers/infidels)

Answer 6

Palin was a member of an Alaskan seperatist group!!!  That is more unpatriotic than both of your options!!  

Obama was 8 years old when William ayers was a terrorist and they only worked together.  Do you vet every person YOU work with? Stop listening to soo much Sean Hannity...

Answer 7

You are right.

Nobody should negotiate with President Bush.

Answer 8

OH I HAVE AN IDEA!!!!!!

Oh wait, never mind...

Diplomacy with a known terrorist is way dumber.  

Answer 9

Abstinence as birth control.

Answer 10

What?  What's really ludicrous is your grammar.  Also, adults know how to try to resolve conflicts with words as a first options.  Children know only brute force as a resolution to problems.

Answer 11

Not many practice abstinence anymore.  Every year teen birth rates go up. It's about time to take a different approach. The old ways do not work anymore.

Answer 12

wow, that's a good question, there both way out there, i'm going to have to go for diplomacy, only because it's more dangerous than teenies having kids