Which is a better trade

Question

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2165~70~2184~1982~1024&teams=12~11~12~14~14&te=&cash=. the LA clips get a Pf and a decent bench olayer. the Heat gets their needs. the pacers get rid of tinsely since the pacers dont want him to play with them.

the second trade is http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=70~2184~214~1024~2983~3204&teams=11~22~22~14~14~14&te=&cash=. Portland gets a veteran player that can provide verteranship and leadership, and again pacers get rid of tinlsey. we get players that will fill position needds. i say the second trade is better for heat, but trade one is more reasonable

Answer 1

the second trade dude

Answer 2

none because miami heat is getting the best deal between the 3 teams.

Answer 3

both suck in the first one the Clipps are not going to give up Kaman cause he can play good.

in the second trade the Blazers wont give up Aldridge cause his going to be an All-Star  

Answer 4

second one

much more balanced than the first one

Answer 5

i barely know these people ... bench im guessin

Answer 6

I think the first trade is the best.

In both trades, you traded Tinsley for Blount. Which might be a good idea because Tinsley has had a lot of anger management issues, and Blount is known as a peacemaker.

Heat really needed a center over a PF, and Udonis Haslem wouldn't do a good job as a center. This trade would be perfect for both the Clippers and the Heat.

New Lineup for Heat

PG Mario Chalmers/Jason Williams (Probably Mario Chalmers, but if he does bad as a starter, than they'll put J-Will In)

SG- Dwyane Wade

SF-Shawn Marion/Michael Beasley (Depending on who does better at the 3 position)

PF- Michael Beasley/Shawn Marion

C- Chris Kaman instead of Udonis Haslem. Haslem would have a poor job guarding the dominant centers like Greg Oden, so good trade for both teams!

Good Trade!