Which is better, a vice president with no experience, or a president with no experience? ?

Question

Vice Presidents do almost nothing, especially compared to the president. Apparently liberals do no know this, saying it is "Hypocritical" for republicans to worry about Obama's experience.

Let me guess... "McCain is 72", "VP's sometimes become president", "Obama has more experience than Palin", "Obama makes better judgements" or some senseless attack on Palin. These are all NOT answers to the question.

Answer 1

Clearly McCain is the better choice

Answer 2

Experience of what? Of being Pres or Vice Pres? You really are trying to make a joke of a serious matter.  

Answer 3

A smart Person, as Ronald Reagan was and knew he didn't know everything, would surround himself with smart people to assist him with the decision making. Mac thinks himself already smart, so doesn't need anyone. If he drops dead, Palin would be put into a position that, by her own admission, she knows nothing about, surrounded by fools because Mac was in control, so I think I'll go with the young guy with a brain, not the hot head and his non experienced counterpart.

Answer 4

I will gladly answer your question:  Vice President..Now that we got that out of the way, if this question is referring to the Palin vs. Obama, I would say that both are experienced leaders and that the question doesn't apply to Palin and Obama.  Now if I had to choose between the both, I would choose the one who can relate to the challenges of the working middle class and innercity not just the challenges in the Alaskan wilderness.  I would choose the one who understands the struggles that our senior citizens face when it comes to  inability to pay for healthcare.  I would choose Obama who is  clearly the humane choice.  Now I will say that perhaps Palin is more experienced in hunting, fishing and cooking Moose Stew.  However, I like it best when Obama pointed out that this election is not about him, but about We the People.