Question:

Which is more destructive? Death Star or the Halo rings?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

In terms of destruction, not loss of life.

 Tags:

   Report

6 ANSWERS


  1. This is like comparing AK-47's to Tomahawk missiles. One is a powerful precision attack, the other ends all sentient life in the universe. It's just not a reasonable nor comparable pair, you think?


  2. In terms of destruction, I'd say definitely the Death Star. The Halo rings just totally destroy life, not necessarily destroy everything. In the Halo universe there were plenty of Forerunner structures intact and not damaged after the firing of the seven rings. Death Star just blows things up, it doesnt seek out life forms and kill them.  

  3. In terms of destruction, Death star.

    The Halos don't actually destroy anything (as I understand it) but collapse the molecules of sentient beings or something?

    At any rate, the only thing they 'destroy' is life. It would be like comparing a nuke to a virus. Which causes more destruction?

    Blowing up a planet would be more destructive.

  4. Death Star!

    Beat Halo3 legendary first day!!


  5. Halo rings just kill life....I'd say the Death Star is more destructive

  6. obviously Halo rings...

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 6 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.