Which is more effective? The Executive of the USA or the UK? and why?

Question

ok so the executive of the USA is the President who is the Head of state and the Commander in Chief. So he has total control over the executive here, however can he still pass new laws without the congress approval?

Also in the UK is the executive totally independent from the PM and his party?

So which is the more effective and why?

Answer 1

new laws have to go through the lords in england i wouldn't know which is most effective

Answer 2

Both.

With the new game in town.

Seniority take place.

Leviticus 19.32

To be more effective.

The mystery why he get elected twice.

When he wanted to leave earlier.

With " Sit down ! work not finish yet"

Luke 9.25,55-56,60

What do you think?

Answer 3

US President can't do anything without congress unless its deemed by him "necessary and proper". Usually these are time sensitive emergencies that have to be acted upon before a congressional hearing on the matter can be executed.

not too sure about the whole queen/PM/parliament thing in UK

Answer 4

wow your wrong about the presdant he can pass excutive orders and orders but inless backed by congress their worthless and they can be repealed by the courts as for the commander and cheif thing yes the presdant is but he can't order any invasion or battles with out a vote first being held in congress but he is alllowed to control all military movements and appointments.....adn he get final aopproval in any military conflict.