Which of these trades would benefit the Miami heat the most?

Question

trade 1:http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1981~3196~2184~3218&teams=14~4~4~4&te=&cash=. Bulls get post player and get rid of the excessive money they have to pay for Hinrich, get bench depth, and get rid of their excessive guards.

trad e 2:http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1711~1981~3247~70~3196~2184~549&teams=14~14~13~4~13~4~14&te=&cash

trade 3:http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=3418~3218~3003~3449&teams=16~16~14~14&te=&cash=. this will include the Minnesota timberwolves give up a first round pick, which will cause miami not owing anything to timberwolves due to ricky davis trade

trade 4:http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=429~2165~510&teams=14~6~6&te=&cash=. i would say this would be a last resort

Answer 1

easily the second trade...because they would get a point guard and a center and a powerfoward. being a laker fan i wouldnt mind it because i dont like mihm...they dont even have to give up marion or wade...i dont think the third trade is that good b/c beasley fits into the team in miami and the fourth trade...well you have to give up marion and you get jason kidd...kidd is a good player but the nets played better without him and the mavs didnt do so well with him...

Answer 2

yea i think the first one doesnt reall yhelp thm with money cause hinrich has 4 years left on his contract but i think number 2 is ok and the bst one out of these 4..number 4 jus really wont happen

HEAT 09 CHAMPS

WADE 09 MVP

Answer 3

i say the second trade because they get rid of players that they don't usually play in return for a couple decent players.  I wasn't a fan of the 3rd trade because of the fact that they would get rid of Mike Beasley for Kevin Love when one is obviously better and more NBA ready than the other one.  The first trade isn't THAT bad but in my mind, its pretty bad.  Yea your getting a good player but you would have to lose 3 guys to get him, no thanks.