Question:

Which player would you rather be?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Would you rather be the selfish goal-scorer, who has a knack for the net, and makes sure he lets EVERYONE know, or would you be the not-so-skilled forward, constantly missing the net, and having the butt-end of everyone's jokes falling on you?

 Tags:

   Report

21 ANSWERS


  1. I know I may sound bad but I gotta go with being the selfish scorer.


  2. I would rather set up another player on my team to be the star.

  3. Umm sort of in between but if I had to pick one it would be the show off all-star

  4. Are you asking if I'd rather be LeCavier or Prospel!!!!

  5. Since the first one is the only even remotely appealing option because the second has nothing but negative qualities i'll go with the first.  I myself however am definitely the latter of the two.

  6. only the best player in western civilization.....

    LADISALV KOHN

  7. The selfish goal scorer

  8. Huh?

    Im so confused right now of what you just said.

  9. I'll take the spotlight and the women thank you very much.

  10. I'd rather be the team player with minor skills but work my asss off on offense and defense and isn't afraid to shoot or pass the puck to a teammate. :]

  11. I wouldn't want to be either, I'm more of a "share the wealth" kinda player....but I'd rather score goals for the team then miss the net and be made fun of (plus I'm super competitive) so I'd have to go with selfish goal-scorer

  12. The goal scorer. Its frustrating missing the net and having people make jokes about you. And the coach woul get it in your head your not the only one and to not be selfish with the puck

  13. Given those two choices. I would rather be the selfish scorer. It not only means a better paycheck, But job security as well. The other player will most likely be moving onto another team or the minors if they can't get it together . The ideal is somewhere in the middle of those two. Being a good set up player would be a better gig in my opinion

  14. As bad as this may sound, I'd rather be the selfish goal scorer. Sometimes you have to be selfish.

    And i know this is random but both the guys above me have the exact same face.

  15. It's better to be the cocky player who's actually good then the polite player who's not. Career lasts longer that way, I get paid more, and really people don't' tend to care about attitude if you produce. If you have a bad attitude and you don't produce (see: yashin) You're out of there.

  16. Neither !! I would rather be the playmaker who makes the occasional goal during the time it is needed and sets up the others for the super star. He scores, we go into the playoffs . Isn't that what hockey is all about ?

  17. No J.O he was asking if you wanted to be Jagr or Straka....well doesnt Jagr fit both also?

  18. well i've been both of those people in my career, and trust me the first one is better

  19. The goal-scorer, I rather be the player that is worth the $ and scoring important goals for my team.

  20. Which one has the better chance of winning the Cup? If it's the non-scorer, then he ends up with the last laugh.

  21. I think that's a now brainer I would rather be the not so skilled forward who doesn't miss the net creates allot of rebound opportunities for my ego maniac team mate rocks the corners and the sidewalls and basks in knowing that I am the real heart and soul of my team no matter who realizes it.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 21 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.