Who's a better scrambler? Tarvaris Jackson or Seneca Wallace?

Question

Who's a better scrambler? Tarvaris Jackson or Seneca Wallace?

Answer 1

I agree with Mac... Seneca is off the hook to the point where the Hawks want to put him in the game with Matt Hasselbeck.  If effen Charlie Frye could get his act together and be a competent backup the Hawks would feel more comfortable sending Seneca in at WR or lining up in the backfield.  They have the plays, but they can't afford to put their #2 at risk.

It's interesting... Wallace isn't Mike Holmgren's type of QB and yet he's stuck for so long.  That also tells you how much his athleticism is rated in Seattle.  He could easily play WR.

No knock to TJ - he's underated and a darn good scrambler... Seneca just has world class speed.

Answer 2

Is this a real question?

Wallace is way better.  He's only 5'10, but he's probably the most athletic player in the whole league.  And for being that small, he has a rocket arm and knows the SEA system like the back of his hand.  His problem is that he never gets a chance to play.  He played the 1st half in the MIN game and threw around 200 yds and 3 TDs.  He doesn't need to run to make big plays, but when he does, they are huge 20-30 yd runs.

Jackson is okay... nothing fantastic.  If he can learn to manage the game and limit turnovers, MIN can make the playoffs.  Reminds me of Vince Young.