0 LIKES LikeUnLike
I see that both guys get a lot of attention, one for genetics, and the other for menacing appearance and fixed fights. Who do you think will do down into fighting history as the bigger joke? Both seem to be able to create themselves cash and notoriety while so many better fighters languish. Doesn't seem terribly fair. I s'pose it's unfair to compare a boxer to a cagefighter, but my viewpoint is from a sports-entertainment motif.
Tags:
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Latest activity: earlier. This question has 5 answers.