0 LIKES LikeUnLike
This is a legitimate question and its very plausible.Who would survive longer, a vegetarian in the american wilderness given only the tools to pick the wild berries and dig for wild vegetables...or an omnivore given a rifle in order to hunt animals?Id place my bets on the man with the rifile....so if its so hard to be a vegetarian without the mass man made fields of crops...then why do so many think its the way forward? especially since we are omnivores...why change somthing that biological to us...hey we have 2 feet just because we could move on all fours doent mean we should why change?I just cant see why vegetarians think its so great when in a realistic worl without a supermarket 99% would starve as they dont know how to grow and harvest thier own cropsInfact id make a deal right here right now...If every vegetarian only every ate what they grew...and i only ate what i hunted and grew...i bet i wouldnt go to bed hungry a single night...could vegetarians say the same thing...the onlyway they survive is foriegn imports...without all that fruit and veg force grown to meet demands britain would lose 80% of its population in a couple of years
Tags:
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Latest activity: earlier. This question has 3 answers.