Who agrees with the golden point rule in NRL? and why?

Question

Who disagrees with the rule & why?

Answer 1

i agree coz draws suck!!!

give them a chance to determine a winner and if they cant score a point in extra time its just a really good match

Answer 2

for the fans i think golden point is a great thing, if 2 teams play a good enough game to get the draw then an extra time of that same game would be the go and we all need a winner. but i cannot say from a players point of view if this is right or if it is not as i am not a club player. but in local matches of mine i would love extra point

Answer 3

I disagree because, like i said in a very simliar question... if two teams play well enough to be a draw at the end of the game.. then thats them deserving there share in the points and while us supporters love the intesity of a golden point game... i dont believe its right...

Answer 4

I disagree with it greatly. Because its just not cricket.

Storm girl basically covered it

Answer 5

I agree but sometimes a disagree when it's the team am goin 4 that loser

Answer 6

um yes i agree.. it makes the game more entertaining and satisfying.. and gives teams a little bit more time to fight for the 2 points.. if ur talkin bout city vs country though than i agree also.. there are no points 2 play for just pride so if its draw at the end of the game its obviously been a equal beauty

Answer 7

i like it

extra time means 1 more beer

Answer 8

I do think we need extra time, but I don't think golden point is the best to resolve the match, a 10min(for example, maybe 5 or 15) extra time and the team with the most would be better.