Who agress that vader is better than the undertaker?

Question

Don't get me wrong, I like taker, but vader is so much better. Vader is one of the great big men of all time and is a former three time wcw world champion. Vader> Undertker VADER TIME! Also had a h**l of a match with hbk for the wwe title after hbk had held it at that point for five months and eventally a eight month reigin. ( wresltmaina to surivour seris) on of the great title runs ever , Even though he lost, he put on one h**l of a show.

Answer 1

I think undertaker is the most hardcore wrestler out there.Who could take pretty much anybody. So i'd have to say undertaker<3.

Answer 2

Undertaker is better!!!

Answer 3

Vader sucks.

he couldnt beat batista and taker whopped all over batista so how the heck is vader better.

Answer 4

who agrees that you are a dumb a*s*s?

Answer 5

THE UNDERTAKER IS THE BEST

Answer 6

I remember that match, actually.  It was a great match.  But if you noticed, Vader very rarely had a great match against another big man.  Know why?  Because really, Vader wasn't that great.  He needed a smaller, faster, more technical wrestler, like HBK, to kinda carry him to a great match.  Undertaker CAN wrestler other big men like Batista, Umaga, Kamala, Khali, dozens more, and still have great matches with them.  That's because Undertaker is great enough to (usually) carry THEM to a great match.  That's the difference.

Answer 7

dude taker is the phenom. he's the best right now inthe wwe with HHH,jericho,shawn micheals and JBL

Answer 8

its all fake so how can one be better than the other

Answer 9

Thanks for the two points.

Answer 10

Your view is not very popular here, but I can sort of see where you're coming from. Still gotta side with Undertaker though.

Answer 11

I'm a big fan of the former Big Van Vader, but his resume pales in comparison to Taker. Taker has been in more memorable matches, had better feuds, and didn't smell (at least according to Ken Shamrock).

Undertaker's had too many matches that would be better than that Vader/HBK match:

Undertaker/Jeff Hardy

Undertaker/Foley (h**l in a cell)

Undertaker/Edge

Undertaker/Batista

Answer 12

i think taker is better.. but yeah, vader is also a h**l of a wrestler! he's big yet he's agile & he can move pretty well.. too bad the guy wasn't given the ample credit that he rightfully deserves..

Answer 13

i disagree..i wasnt a fan of vader's in ring work