Who believes there is nothing wrong with going barefoot as long as its not hazardous?

Question

Who believes there is nothing wrong with going barefoot as long as its not hazardous?

Answer 1

Me.

Answer 2

I don't see anything wrong with it. I mean, at work where it's professional you should wear shoes to be respectful, but otherwise, hey, go barefoot

Answer 3

me!   i love going barefoot when i can, and its safe, feels great especially after wearing hot shoes all day haha

Answer 4

barefoot is the way to be!  I try not to wear shoes!

Answer 5

me..

Answer 6

I do I do. I would go barefoot everywhere and anywhere if possible, year round.

It's healthy, it's natural, and it's fun. it's also sensual ;) plus it is rarely, if ever, hazardous.

Answer 7

Define "not hazardous".  I go barefoot at home and in my back yard by my pool.  However, I live in the Phoenix area, so you have to keep an eye out for scorpions and other little beasties that could get you.  Even my own house is technically hazardous.

Answer 8

I do I am always barefoot at home and if the weather is nice I will walk outside barefoot

Answer 9

It isn't hazardous to go barefoot (except for some extreme circumstances like construction sites, labs, or truly extreme weather), so there's nothing wrong with it, period.

As for injury, it's really not so dangerous. In eleven years of going barefoot always and everywhere, I get a tiny splinter maybe once a year, I've NEVER had a cut. Yet I walk and run in places like inner city sidewalks, the train station, the recycling center, bottle banks in other places, etc, etc... When you go barefoot a lot, feet quickly get *much* tougher than people who rarely go barefoot think. To be honest it surprised even me; I was never seriously concerned about great risks, but when I started going barefoot I didn't expect to be able to walk everywhere without any concern at all, the first year or so I watched much more carefully to go around broken glass or bramble bushes than necessary.

As for our health, our skin is made to keep pathogens out, and we're at far greater risk of picking something up through our hands than our feet. While the dirt is far less visible, there are as many or more germs on things touched by many people (shopping carts, railings, door k***s) as on the ground. And unless we prop our feet up on the table, with our hands we're more likely to transfer those germs to our face or food, allowing them to enter our body.

For the health of others, germs do not jump off the sole of a bare foot any more than off the sole of a shoe, or off the exposed skin of a totally bare foot any more than off the exposed skin of a foot stuck in a flipflop.

About parasites, the hookworm can enter the skin, but it hasn't been a serious problem in the South since modern plumbing has replaced the outhouses, and never was a problem in cooler climates. Dog hookworm is still around but has a harder time penetrating the skin of humans. It can be a concern in those countries where plumbing and hygiene is at a lower level than in the West, but even if you pick something up on a tropical vacation, it is easily treated with modern medicine.

About athlete's foot, it's unlikely to spread by going barefoot in stores, restaurants or on sidewalks. It's a fungus, it needs a warm, dark, slightly damp place to grow, as well as a somewhat damp and warm floor to live long enough to be picked up by anyone else. It spreads in locker rooms and pools, but unless you're *right* behind an infected barefooter, any spores someone else may have left behind will long have dried up and died on most other surfaces. And even if you were to pick up some spores, you'd need to put your feet back into closed shoes (that warm, dark and slightly damp place :P) for them to grow. On the surface of the bare skin, exposed to light and fresh air, it'll just dry up and die. Foot fungus is very rare among populations that go barefoot more often, not more common as you may've thought.

Our feet do not need support. From Samuel B. Shulman's. "Survey in China and India of Feet That Have Never Worn Shoes,"

One hundred and eighteen of those interviewed were rickshaw coolies. Because these men spend very long hours each day on cobblestone or other hard roads pulling their passengers at a run it was of particular interest to survey them. If anything, their feet were more perfect than the others. All of them, however, gave a history of much pain and swelling of the foot and ankle during the first few days of work as a rickshaw puller. But after either a rest of two days or a week's more work on their feet, the pain and swelling passed away and never returned again. There is no occupation more strenuous for the feet than trotting a rickshaw on hard pavement for many hours each day yet these men do it without pain or pathology.

For children it is *much* better to go barefoot:

"...children who had the opportunity of going barefoot a great deal, had less deformed toes, greater flexor strength, more ability to spread the toes. They also had denser muscles on the bottom of the feet; greater agility than those who had never gone barefoot, with a wider range of hip circumduction and more flexibility of the gluteal and hamstring muscles, and therefore, more ability to touch the toes when the knees were held stiff."

&

"In Europe and America flat foot is a common reason for attendance at a children's orthopaedic clinic, but in India children are seldom brought for treatment for flat foot. The few children who do attend with this complaint are from affluent urban families and they all wear shoes. In our clinic we have never seen a child from the farming community or from the family of a manual labourer who complained of flat foot."

Fortunately those working at the Health Department know better than the average person: contrary to popular belief, there are NO laws against going barefoot in stores, regardless of whether food is served. Stores can set their own dress codes, and in the US quite a few do, but any signs claiming 'by order of the Health Department' are