a girl works at a bank
she cashed a check under mr smiths account on last day of work
check goes missing, mr smith says he never cashed a check that large before.
security says that the girl cashed a "fake check" then took the money
security says that they never checked her work station only the back room.
security tapes reveal nothing out of the ordinary, never see the girl take any money. mr smith is with the girl the entire time the transaction was done
bank managers have lied under oath saying the only way she could cash the check was with an unauthorized code that she was NEVER given.
bank employee handbook tells employees how to use this code and needs a managers approval in order for it to be processed.
so my question is how can this girl be found guilty of this crime?
security admitted that they did not see anything on the tape and that her work station was never checked, asst manager lied about an unauthorized code being used when it is clearly in the employee handbook. isn't it possible mr smith accidently was given back the check then lied saying he never cashed the check that way he got free money?
if you were the jury would you find this girl guilty?
Tags: