Who do you like more, Hillary's or Sarah's speech? Why?

Question

Who do you like more, Hillary's or Sarah's speech? Why?

Answer 1

kind of hard to like something that sounds like nothing but the usual right-wing GOP taking points and lies.

Bet Sarah's speech would have been better if McCain and Bush wouldn't have written it for her.

Answer 2

Sarah's

Her speech provided the first serious glimpse at what turned out to be an unadulteratedly neoconservative position on foreign policy: a year old video of her declaring the Iraq War a task from God notwithstanding.

Twice in her speech, she declared victory in Iraq to be “within sight”, and praised Senator McCain for having the “sheer guts” to defend the unpopular war though many predicted it would cost him voter support. She likewise lauded McCain’s war experience and chastised her Democrat opponents for their lack of military service. She also claimed that McCain had been granted special wisdom and compassion from his service and detention “by the grace of God”.

Beyond Iraq, the Alaska Governor appeared to see threats everywhere, cautioning the crowd against “dangerous foreign powers” who don’t have America’s best interest at heart. She accused Russia of “wanting to control a vital pipeline in the Caucasus,” presumably referring to the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline, though the recent war with Georgia did not leave Russia in control of any territory near this pipeline. She also said Russia was “using energy as a weapon,” in a segment of her speech focused on energy independence.

She also promised “to confront the threat that Iran might seek to cut off nearly a fifth of world energy supplies,” though Iran has only threatened to do this if they are attacked. Presumably also referring to Iran, she spoke of “terrorist states” which are “seeking nuclear weapons without delay,” and condemned Democratic presidential nominee Barrack Obama for saying he would meet with them without preconditions.

Finally, she warned that terrorists may disrupt Saudi Arabia’s oil supply, and warned that al-Qaeda “still plot(s) to inflict catastrophic harm on America,” while mocking Obama for being “worried that someone won’t read ‘em their rights”.

Answer 3

Hillary

because she actually talked about obama's plan unlike Palin who just trashed Obama and contradicted her beliefs (bridge to hope)

Answer 4

Neither was very good.

Answer 5

Sarah,,,shes smart and a conservative...hilldemon is an idiot and a liberal...'nuff said

Answer 6

Hillary's, she actually dealt with issues instead of rhetoric.

Answer 7

HILLARY??? WHOS HILLARY???

HAHAHHAAAAHAHHAA

MCCCAIN PALIN 2008!!!!!

COUNTRY FIRST!!!! ***===***===*==*==

Answer 8

Like comparing the speech ability of JFK to "w", give us a break.

Answer 9

Sarah's speech had good one liners in it.  In Hillary's speech Bill was the only one who thought her jokes were funny.  No comedic timing whatsoever.

Answer 10

Oh the irony of subconscious sexism...

To answer your question I would say they were both equally good in their own rights.  Clinton did a fantastic job of appealing to her base to accept Obama.  That was her role and she played it to a T.  Palin did a fantastic job introducing herself to America and letting us get to know about her make-up, no not the eye-liner, and background.  Her role was to meet the USA and keep the spirits up.  She aced it.

Obama in 2008