Who do you think should have won UFC 86 Jackson or Griffin?

Question

Who do you think should have won UFC 86 Jackson or Griffin?

Answer 1

Ok for all of you who think that Rampage got robbed. I fight MMA I have lost a decision and I though I should have won. Well if you have never been a judge then you don't know. Judges are that judges its like being in a beauty contest just more blood. The areas that are judged are:

-Clean Strikes- both fighters had but Rampage more wild thats a point off.

-Effective Grappling- Well we all know how Rampage fells about this he doesnt do it more points off.

-Octagon Control- Griffin controled the gon for almost the whole fight.

-Effective Aggressiveness- The fact that Girffin stood in and took punches and had a few number of knock downs after some of the heavy hits he charged in and countered this gave him an advantage.

So please before you go all oh he got robbed on use look at the scoreing system. In mma you dont whine about the desicion you do somthing about it. Just goes to show that Rampage was under trained should have came harder.

Answer 2

forrest won watch in on MMAturf.net

Answer 3

by my self is an idiot.he's just pasting his answer every question related to the subject.rampage won that fight.we all know the scoring system.learn to type."effective striking!"that went on 4 out of 5 rounds on griffins face.he was definitely worse for wear.they probably didn't want to see griffin cry again like he did when jardine whipped his ***.

Answer 4

This should sum up the real winner of this fight.  Did Rampage manage to pull off a 10-8 round like Forrest did? Did Rampage hurt Forrest like Forrest hurt Rampage’s leg? And did Rampage nearly pull off any submissions like Forrest did? Rampage’s striking looked dangerous throughout the entire fight but never knocked Forrest stupid.