Who has the most environmentally friendly house. President George Bush or Environmental activist Al Gore?

Question

Please no bashing !!!

Just use facts and leave the name calling out.

Please research your answers.

Don't just assume you know the answer. Spend at least 5 minutes looking at the facts.

Even former Vice President Al Gore deserves that.

Answer 1

President George Bush

Answer 2

Big Al can live as un-green as he wants....but OTHER people had better make changes in THEIR lives.  That's how con men have always been.  Religious con men are the same.  "Worldly" things have no place in a good christians life...but look at how the con men (and women) live.  It's the same for these GW hot air purveyors.  And Big Al is no different.

Answer 3

According to SNOPES, it's President Bush, by a landslide.

Answer 4

Bush, (I assume you mean the ranch and not the White House) ....... Al Gore lives in a 10,000 square foot house and reportedly uses 221,000kWh of electricity per year.

By comparison, I live in a 2500 square foot house and use 6500 kWh per year.

Gore's energy density is 22.1 kWh/sq.ft./year,  mine is 2.6/sq.ft./year.

Answer 5

Bush does.

Only we commoners have to comply, not the elite.

Algore's mission statement: do as i say, not as I do.

Answer 6

Sorry but everyone will have to bash Al Gore (The Environmental Wh&ore) as he is the world's biggest lier (Lying Al Gore the internet inventor) and and (lying Al Gore, the energy credit claimer) . He is just so bad. He deserves nothing but derision. Sorry - We would like to be positive but there is absolutely nothing to be positive about.

Answer 7

Ya Snopes lays it out. AT least for the regular mansion Algore resides in on a regular basis he owns a couple more.

Answer 8

Al Gore may deserve an honest investigation into the subject, but he doesn't benefit from a 5 minute peek at the facts.  His behavior is truly shameful in light of his personal hypocrisy.

Answer 9

This question is a trap because the house of neither one has been shown to be anti-environment!  People are part of the environment too! As long as they do not produce irritants or deadly pollutants they are fine.

The 'smuggled' assumption is that Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is anti environment!  Nothing could be further from the truth. CO2 promotes plant growth and is produced by natural means, such as breathing and the warming of the oceans salt water.

Answer 10

You ask for no bashing, yet this very questing is baiting and bashing.  This question has been up over-and-over.  Everyone that has spent some time here has to be sick of seeing this.

So what's your agenda for tossing this trite question out here?

You think that Bush selling some $3 billion in federal lands (some of this established old growth with hiking trails) in 49 states to subsidize urban and suburban projects in Nevada is offset by Al Gore's house not being as green as it could?

Or that the President's end-run to allow mining companies to be less responsible in strip mining operations is okay just because Gore's house has a poor green footprint?

Grow up and wake up.

Yes, Gore's house is worse than the Presidents.  But there is  no other president in history that has a worse environmental track record than this one.

Answer 11

I would have to say that Al Gore's house is the most environmentally unfriendly house of the two.  Every thing that I have heard about Bush and his ranch is that it is an operating ranch so you have to be friendly to the environment to raise cattle in Texas.