Who is better at the Full Back Possition in the NRL?

Question

Karmichael Hunt - Broncos

Brett Stewart - Sea Eagles

I think i would rather have Karmichael since he has played at Full Back for a long time and is now expeienced and a has a good way bringing the ball back running straight.

Who is better ate Full Back

Answer 1

For me, Hunt hands down.  A great player, awesome kick returns, and for me has more to offer in attack!!!  Stewarts good though.

Answer 2

Brett Stewart for sure but thats just because I am a one eyed silver tail.  Hunt is okay I suppose

Answer 3

Out of these two options, I would rate Karmichael HUNT as the best hands down.  No one runs the ball back to the line as fast and hard as HUNT.  He is also very versatile, which makes him a far better option for any team.

Keep an eye on David Milne from the Canberra Raiders though......he will be the next full back to make an impact in the NRL.

Answer 4

Hunt is the best fullback in the game by far.

The modern game sees the fullback playing like a second 5/8 and hunt is the best at it with his Superior  ball skills and kicking ability, There is no one better under the high ball not even "Billy the kid". His kick returns are better against a set defencive line and his on field talk and direction for the broncos defencive line in front of him is second to none. He also can play numerous positions if required(Fullback, wing, 5/8, halfback, lock)

Stewart's  talents, (speed and and kick returns) would be better suited on the wing imo

Answer 5

hunt 4 sure. stewart isn't as good very close but.

Answer 6

Stewart. Faster, score from anywhere, can be trusted at fullback.

Hunt is gonna get injured one day-he takes the ball up too hard IMO

Answer 7

Stewart. quicker, better at reading the game and is just a better fullback all round.

but Slater is better than both

Answer 8

Karmichael Hunt of course!!

Answer 9

I would say Stewart tho they are both pretty handy. Pearsonally I think Wade Mckinnion has the biggest impact.

Answer 10

Stewart by a mile. Speed, timing, great defence. Hunt relies on Lockyer, who could make Barry Humphries into a world class fullback. Stewart has to work off Orford, and even worse, Jamie Lyon. We saw how c**p Hunt's attacking ability was in SOO 1.

Bowen and Slater are better than Hunt, and before his long run of injuries - Minichiello was better than all of them.

Answer 11

both are really good fullbacks but i would say brett stewart

his much faster and can make something out of nothing, his one of the best fullbacks

Go Manly!!

Answer 12

Both have amazing talent, but if i wanted a Fullback that could win me a Grand final it would be Hunt for various reasons.

While Stewart can be amazing running off a halfback or 5/8th that can put him in a hole, he has up to zero ball skills when it comes to drawing players and general passing. He can also turn cold extremely fast, he also is a bit prone to bad decision making in defence and his tackling is suspect. Hunt is a more complete fullback, has a great running style, good at running off someones hip, good under the high ball and can also use the ball well. He's also useful as he can play in the forwards.

Answer 13

they good in different ways

you cant chose.

stewart quick fast skilful and very good

hunt shoulder barging, quick, skilful

cant chose.  

Answer 14

Brett Stewart is the best fullback in the game

Answer 15

Stewart is a smarter,faster & all round tactical fullback but still not as good as the great Kurt Gidley