Who is more inexperienced?

Question

Obama or Palin?

And why?

Answer 1

Obama - he has been to places as a Senator that Palin can only point to on a map.

Obama has met world leaders that Palin has only read about in the paper.

Answer 2

Obama has been in the statehouse 8 yrs.Palin has been Governor of Alaska for 2 years

Answer 3

Depends on what you consider experience.  Obviously, different people see experience differently.

the question you should ask yourself is who will gain more experience before we think of them as president and who will get their immediately if experience plays a part in your decision.

Answer 4

obama    only thing he runs his is train set

Palin has run a State for 22 months

Palin would make a better President then Obama

Im sure most democrats would Love Palin as VP

or at least Hillary

Answer 5

You mean that you are comparing a governor with executive experience to a community organization and a first term senator?

Please, you know you are in trouble when people even are disputing the fact, that the top of your ticket is possibly less experienced than the VP on another ticket.

Answer 6

Obama...he has never DONE anything with his positions

Answer 7

Is this a trick question?  Obviously, Obama has little to no experience, unless you can count the 20 years he spent in a racist church.  A dog catcher has more real-world experience than Obama.  Palin has more experience by default, although her real-world and political experience is quite impressive for her age.

Answer 8

If you add up the state and national experience you get 2 years for Palin (as gov of AK)  and 12 years for Obama (4 years in US Senate and 8 years in IL state Senate).

Answer 9

Obama. He has never held an executive position. He promised change and his first appointment (the VP) was an old old Washingtonite. Where do you see change? Is it out of fear? Obama went to the Israeli lobby and, while on his knees, he lied to them, tto. He's an excellent liar!

Answer 10

Obama ran community center, big deal.

He has done absolutely nothing as Senator.

You would think that for all his talk of change, he would have done something as a Senator to promote change. But nope, Obama accomplished nothing and showed no leadership.

Did Obama fight against government waste? No.

Did Obam fight against corruption? No.

Did Obama challenge his own party to end partisan politics? No.

Did Obama champion any causes? No.

So what did Obama do as Senator? The few times he voted, he voted along party lines and the status quo.

Palin fought against government corruption, waste and corporate corruption. She also held members of her own party accountable for corruption.

Answer 11

We keep hearing from the dems that Obama has all this experience and how smart he is.  He attended an ivy league college just as G.W. Bush did except Bush got degrees from two ivy league colleges and the dems call Bush dumb.  You can find any number of people that will tell you about what Bush did with his life in college, apparently not one person remembers Obama.  Not one single person has stepped forward to tell us about what a great student he was in  college or what fantastic accomplishments he made as a community organizer, (whatever that is). I haven't seen anyone from the State of Illinois legislature come forward singing Obama's praises for his accomplishments there either.  Further, he's only worked 143 days in the Senate of the United States in the two years he's been a member. He's the chairman of a committer on foreign relations and has never one time held a meeting or chaired a meeting.  You tell me who's more experienced.  In my opinion, he's only experienced at doing whatever it takes to move up the ladder to big bucks in his bank account.  

Answer 12

Obama.  Because he is the one running for President.  

Answer 13

I believe Palin because she was just mayor and Obama is like a senator. And Obama picked a better vp than mc cain. That's what I think.